Literature DB >> 18459714

Managing environmental enhancement plans for individual research projects at a national primate research center.

Jinhee P Thom1, Carolyn M Crockett.   

Abstract

We describe a method for managing environmental enhancement plans for individual research projects at a national primate research center where most monkeys are assigned to active research projects. The Psychological Well-being Program (PWB) at the University of Washington National Primate Research Center developed an Environmental Enhancement Plan form (EEPL) that allows PWB to quantify and track changes in enrichment allowances over time while ensuring that each animal is provided with as much enrichment as possible without compromising research. Very few projects involve restrictions on toys or perches. Some projects have restrictions on food treats and foraging, primarily involving the provision of these enrichments by research staff instead of husbandry staff. Restrictions are not considered exemptions unless they entirely prohibit an element of the University of Washington Environmental Enhancement Plan (UW EE Plan). All exemptions must be formally reviewed and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Most exemptions from elements of the UW EE Plan involve social housing. Between 2004 and 2006, the percentage of projects with no social contact restrictions increased by 1%, but those prohibiting any tactile social contact declined by 7%, and projects permitting tactile social contact during part of the study increased by 9%. The EEPL form has facilitated informing investigators about the enrichment their monkeys will receive if no restrictions or exemptions are requested and approved. The EEPL form also greatly enhances PWB's ability to coordinate the specific enrichment requirements of a project.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459714      PMCID: PMC2654005     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  9 in total

Review 1.  Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results.

Authors:  Kathryn Bayne
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Mandatory " enriched" housing of laboratory animals: the need for evidence-based evaluation.

Authors:  Ann C Benefiel; Willie K Dong; William T Greenough
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Environmental enrichment for nonhuman primates: theory and application.

Authors:  Corrine K Lutz; Melinda A Novak
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Enrichment and nonhuman primates: "first, do no harm".

Authors:  Randall J Nelson; Timothy D Mandrell
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

5.  Survey of environmental enhancement programs for laboratory primates.

Authors:  Kate C Baker; James L Weed; Carolyn M Crockett; Mollie A Bloomsmith
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Grooming-contact bars provide social contact for individually caged laboratory macaques.

Authors:  C M Crockett; R U Bellanca; C L Bowers; D M Bowden
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1997-11

7.  Guidelines for developing and managing an environmental enrichment program for nonhuman primates.

Authors:  M A Bloomsmith; L Y Brent; S J Schapiro
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1991-08

8.  Frequency of feeding enrichment and response of laboratory nonhuman primates to unfamiliar people.

Authors:  Kate C Baker; Danielle A Springer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  The Effects of Food Treat Provisioning and Human Interaction on the Behavioral Wel1-being of Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  K A Bayne; S L Dexter; G M Strange
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1993-03
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Harms and deprivation of benefits for nonhuman primates in research.

Authors:  Hope Ferdowsian; Agustín Fuentes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-04

2.  Pair housing for female longtailed and rhesus macaques in the laboratory: behavior in protected contact versus full contact.

Authors:  Kate C Baker; Carolyn M Crockett; Grace H Lee; Brooke C Oettinger; Valérie Schoof; Jinhee P Thom
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.440

3.  Comparing options for pair housing rhesus macaques using behavioral welfare measures.

Authors:  Kate C Baker; Mollie A Bloomsmith; Brooke Oettinger; Kimberly Neu; Caroline Griffis; Valérie A M Schoof
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.371

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.