Literature DB >> 18459341

Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition.

André P Schaffers1, Ivo P Raemakers, Karlè V Sýkora, Cajo J F Ter Braak.   

Abstract

Insects and spiders comprise more than two-thirds of the Earth's total species diversity. There is wide concern, however, that the global diversity of arthropods may be declining even more rapidly than the diversity of vertebrates and plants. For adequate conservation planning, ecologists need to understand the driving factors for arthropod communities and devise methods, that provide reliable predictions when resources do not permit exhaustive ground surveys. Which factor most successfully predicts arthropod community structure is still a matter of debate, however. The purpose of this study was to identify the factor best predicting arthropod assemblage composition. We investigated the species composition of seven functionally different arthropod groups (epigeic spiders, grasshoppers, ground beetles, weevils, hoppers, hoverflies, and bees) at 47 sites in The Netherlands comprising a range of seminatural grassland types and one heathland type. We then compared the actual arthropod composition with predictions based on plant species composition, vegetation structure, environmental data, flower richness, and landscape composition. For this we used the recently published method of predictive co-correspondence analysis, and a predictive variant of canonical correspondence analysis, depending on the type of predictor data. Our results demonstrate that local plant species composition is the most effective predictor of arthropod assemblage composition, for all investigated groups. In predicting arthropod assemblages, plant community composition consistently outperforms both vegetation structure and environmental conditions (even when the two are combined), and also performs better than the surrounding landscape. These results run against a common expectation of vegetation structure as the decisive factor. Such expectations, however, have always been biased by the fact that until recently no methods existed that could use an entire (plant) species composition in the explanatory role. Although more recent experimental diversity work has reawakened interest in the role of plant species, these studies still have not used (or have not been able to use) entire species compositions. They only consider diversity measures, both for plant and insect assemblages, which may obscure relationships. The present study demonstrates that the species compositions of insect and plant communities are clearly linked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459341     DOI: 10.1890/07-0361.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  35 in total

1.  Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition.

Authors:  Kate H Orwin; David A Wardle; David R Towns; Mark G St John; Peter J Bellingham; Chris Jones; Brian M Fitzgerald; Richard G Parrish; Phil O'B Lyver
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Airborne and Grain Dust Fungal Community Compositions Are Shaped Regionally by Plant Genotypes and Farming Practices.

Authors:  Loïc Pellissier; Anne Oppliger; Alexandre H Hirzel; Dessislava Savova-Bianchi; Guilain Mbayo; Fabio Mascher; Stefan Kellenberger; Hélène Niculita-Hirzel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Tiger-Moths in Savannas in Eastern Amazon: First Assessment of Diversity and Seasonal Aspects.

Authors:  D M P Valente; M M Zenker; J A Teston
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Feeding and Mobility Traits Influence Grasshopper Vulnerability to Agricultural Production in the Cape Floristic Region Biodiversity Hotspot.

Authors:  S Adu-Acheampong; M J Samways
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Planning for the Maintenance of Floristic Diversity in the Face of Land Cover and Climate Change.

Authors:  Debbie Jewitt; Peter S Goodman; Barend F N Erasmus; Timothy G O'Connor; Ed T F Witkowski
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Ecosystem linkages revealed by experimental lake-derived isotope signal in heathland food webs.

Authors:  David Hoekman; Mireia Bartrons; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tree phylogenetic diversity promotes host-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  Michael Staab; Helge Bruelheide; Walter Durka; Stefan Michalski; Oliver Purschke; Chao-Dong Zhu; Alexandra-Maria Klein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Phylogenetic diversity of plants alters the effect of species richness on invertebrate herbivory.

Authors:  Russell Dinnage
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Accounting for ecosystem alteration doubles estimates of conservation risk in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Randy Swaty; Kori Blankenship; Sarah Hagen; Joseph Fargione; Jim Smith; Jeannie Patton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial factors play a major role as determinants of endemic ground beetle beta diversity of Madeira Island Laurisilva.

Authors:  Mário Boieiro; José C Carvalho; Pedro Cardoso; Carlos A S Aguiar; Carla Rego; Israel de Faria e Silva; Isabel R Amorim; Fernando Pereira; Eduardo B Azevedo; Paulo A V Borges; Artur R M Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.