Literature DB >> 18459284

Voice or choice? Patient and public involvement in the National Health Service in England under New Labour.

Rudolf Forster1, Jonathan Gabe.   

Abstract

Involving patients, caregivers, and citizens in health care and health policy has been recommended by international organizations for over a decade. This article focuses on developments in England under New Labour, places them in the context of broader health policy, and assesses them in the light of the limited empirical evidence. The authors consider a range of possible explanations for these developments. They suggest that we need to distinguish between individual and collective forms of patient involvement, and they chart patient and public involvement in England before New Labour and in three distinct phases under New Labour. There has been a significant extension of opportunities for individual patients and the public to communicate their views, albeit with twists and turns in the policy over time. The authors explain these developments in terms of New Labour's ideological attachment to pragmatism and the Third Way, political calculations about the need to reinvigorate political culture, and attempts to enhance cost-effectiveness. Patient and public involvement seems to be here to stay, but whether this will result in greater equity and a real shift in power away from professionals to citizens and patients is another matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459284     DOI: 10.2190/HS.38.2.g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  15 in total

1.  Choice vs. voice? PPI policies and the re-positioning of the state in England and Wales.

Authors:  David Hughes; Caroline Mullen; Peter Vincent-Jones
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Community participation for rural health: a review of challenges.

Authors:  Amanda Kenny; Jane Farmer; Virginia Dickson-Swift; Nerida Hyett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  'Calling executives and clinicians to account': user involvement in commissioning cancer services.

Authors:  David H Evans; Roger J Bacon; Elizabeth Greer; Angela M Stagg; Pat Turton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Lynda Johnston; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  'No one wants to be the face of Herpes London': a qualitative study of the challenges of engaging patients and the public in sexual and reproductive health and HIV/AIDS services.

Authors:  Nicola Robinson; Ava Lorenc
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Patient Groups and the Construction of the Patient-Consumer in Britain: An Historical Overview.

Authors:  Alex Mold
Journal:  J Soc Policy       Date:  2010-10

7.  The contribution of the Medicines Use Review (MUR) consultation to counseling practice in community pharmacies.

Authors:  Asam Latif; Kristian Pollock; Helen F Boardman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-05-31

8.  (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.

Authors:  Russell Mannion; Mark Exworthy
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Involving self-help groups in health-care institutions: the patients' contribution to and their view of 'self-help friendliness' as an approach to implement quality criteria of sustainable co-operation.

Authors:  Stefan Nickel; Alf Trojan; Christopher Kofahl
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Lack of effective communication between communities and hospitals in Uganda: a qualitative exploration of missing links.

Authors:  Elizeus Rutebemberwa; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Olico Okui; Damien Walker; Aloysius Mutebi; George Pariyo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.