Literature DB >> 18459283

Clearing the air: the evolution of organized labor's role in tobacco control in the United States.

Jennifer Zelnick1, Richard Campbell, Charles Levenstein, Edith Balbach.   

Abstract

As efforts to make U.S. worksites smoke-free took shape in the 1980s, the tobacco industry sought to defeat them by forming alliances with organized labor. The alliance between the tobacco industry and organized labor was based on framing the regulation of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) as a threat to jobs, an example of management unilateralism, and an issue that divided smoking and nonsmoking union members. The dynamics of organized labor and tobacco control began to change in the late 1980s with attempts to ban smoking on airlines and in the hospitality industry. Flight attendants, bar and restaurant workers, and casino dealers-all subject to ETS in their work environments-confronted ETS as an occupational health issue. Against the backdrop of increasing awareness of the hazards of ETS, and the acceptance of tobacco control policy, this framing changed the basis of organized labor's role in tobacco control. Because service workers share the workplace with the general public, their occupational health issues are also public health issues. This fact presents new opportunities for coalition building to protect the health of service workers and the public alike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459283     DOI: 10.2190/HS.38.2.f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  5 in total

1.  Gambling with our health: smoke-free policy would not reduce tribal casino patronage.

Authors:  Isaiah Shaneequa Brokenleg; Teresa K Barber; Nancy L Bennett; Simone Peart Boyce; Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Vested Interests in addiction research and policy. Alliance between tobacco and alcohol industries to shape public policy.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Pamela Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Why strong tobacco control measures "can't" be implemented in the U.S. Military: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 4.  The impact and relevance of tobacco control research in low-and middle-income countries globally and to the US.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Geoffrey T Fong; James F Thrasher; Joanna E Cohen; Wasim Maziak; Harry Lando; Jeffrey Drope; Raul Mejia; Joaquin Barnoya; Rima Nakkash; Ramzi G Salloum; Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.

Authors:  Yvette van der Eijk; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.