Literature DB >> 18459090

Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett's esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology.

R Singh1, G K Anagnostopoulos, K Yao, H Karageorgiou, P J Fortun, A Shonde, K Garsed, P V Kaye, C J Hawkey, K Ragunath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Validation of a simplified classification of mucosal morphology in prediction of histology in Barrett's esophagus using narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBI-Z) and assessing its reproducibility by endoscopists experienced in the use of NBI (NBI-experts) and by endoscopists who were new to NBI (non-NBI-experts). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 109 patients with Barrett's esophagus at a single tertiary referral center, mucosal patterns visualized in Barrett's esophagus on NBI-Z were classified into four easily distinguishable types: A, round pits with regular microvasculature; B, villous/ridge pits with regular microvasculature; C, absent pits with regular microvasculature; D, distorted pits with irregular microvasculature. The NBI-Z grading was compared with the final histopathological diagnosis, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. The reproducibility of the grading was then assessed by NBI-expert and non-NBI-expert endoscopists, and interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Per-biopsy analysis: In 903 out of 1021 distinct areas (87.9%) the NBI-Z grading corresponded to the histological diagnosis. Per-patient analysis: The PPV and NPV for type A pattern (columnar mucosa without intestinal metaplasia) were 100% and 97% respectively; for types B and C (intestinal metaplasia) they were 88% and 91% respectively, and for type D (high-grade dysplasia) 81% and 99% respectively. Inter- and intraobserver agreement: The mean kappa values in assessing the various patterns were 0.71 and 0.87 in the non-expert group; 0.78 and 0.91 in the expert group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated a simplified classification of the various morphologic patterns visualized in Barrett's esophagus and confirmed its reproducibility when used by NBI-expert and non-NBI-expert endoscopists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459090     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  43 in total

Review 1.  Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett's oesophagus: a review on current practice.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; SweeLin Chen Yi Mei; Sandeep Sethi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Barrett esophagus: an update.

Authors:  Rami J Badreddine; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rupa Banerjee; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-19

4.  Era of Barrett's surveillance: does equipment matter?

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Narrow band imaging in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Mitchell M Lee; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  Narrow-band imaging of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Manabu Muto; Takahiro Horimatsu; Yasumasa Ezoe; Kimiko Hori; Yoshiyuki Yukawa; Shuko Morita; Shinichi Miyamoto; Tsutomu Chiba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Ultrahigh speed en face OCT capsule for endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kaicheng Liang; Giovanni Traverso; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman Oguz Ahsen; Zhao Wang; Benjamin Potsaid; Michael Giacomelli; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Ross Barman; Alex Cable; Hiroshi Mashimo; Robert Langer; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Feasibility of a simplified narrow-band imaging classification system for Barrett's esophagus for novice endoscopists.

Authors:  Hiroto Furuhashi; Kenichi Goda; Yuichi Shimizu; Masayuki Kato; Masakazu Takahashi; Akira Dobashi; Koji Hirata; Ayane Oba; Taku Shigesawa; Masaki Inoue; Hiroaki Matsui; Chika Kinoshita; Yoshitaka Ando; Masahiro Ikegami; Tadakazu Shimoda; Mototsugu Kato
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy in post-endoscopic resection scar for early gastric neoplasm: a prospective short-term follow-up endoscopy study.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Il Kwun Chung; Ji Young Park; Chang Kyun Lee; Suck Ho Lee; Hong Soo Kim; Sang Heum Park; Sun Joo Kim; Hyun Deuk Cho; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.