Literature DB >> 18459078

Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique.

C Palanivelu1, P S Rajan, M Rangarajan, R Parthasarathi, P Senthilnathan, P Praveenraj.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures have been tested using numerous approaches, mainly in animals. In humans, only cholecystectomy has been assessed, using a combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. We present another variant of a hybrid technique for cholecystectomy, namely the combination of a flexible transumbilical double-channel endoscope and a 3-mm rigid transcutaneous trocar placed in the left hypochondrium for liver retraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The procedure was attempted in 10 well-selected young patients (M : F = 4 : 6, mean age 29.5 years). Instruments used through the two working channels of the endoscope were either a grasping forceps or snare for grasping and pulling and a hot-biopsy forceps for cold and hot preparation and dissection. Endoclips were used for cystic duct and artery closure. Postoperative analgesia consisted of one intravenous dose of analgesic, followed by oral administration for one further day. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months.
RESULTS: In 4 of the 10 cases the operation had to be converted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to difficulty in dissection (in 2 cases) or uncontrollable hemorrhage (2 cases). The mean operating time was 148 minutes. Of the 6 cases in which the procedure was finished by the new approach, cystic artery bleeding occurred in 1 and was successfully clipped. One further patient had a postoperative cystic duct leak with a bilioma, successfully treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stenting. Five of the six patients reported themselves as satisfied at 3- or 6-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: So far, our endoscope-based transumbilical cholecystectomy technique has not yielded satisfactory results in humans. Further instrument and accessory improvements may increase both success rate and acceptance. Scarless surgery without the inherent risks of a transluminal approach may then become feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459078     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  38 in total

1.  Patient views through the keyhole: new perspectives on single-incision vs. multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer Hey; Keith John Roberts; Gareth J Morris-Stiff; Giles J Toogood
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Current status and prerequisites for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Hao Xu; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Alessandro Fichera; Marco Zoccali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthias Federlein; Dietmar Borchert; Verena Müller; Yüksel Atas; Frauke Fritze; Jens Burghardt; Dirk Elling; Klaus Gellert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Sanjay Purkayastha; Jean Nehme; Lord Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Totally transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy without visible abdominal scar using improved instruments.

Authors:  Jiang Fan Zhu; Hai Hu; Ying Zhang Ma; Man Zhu Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  E-NOTES appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery?

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; Sandrine Ostermann; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ronald Scott Chamberlain; Sujit Vijay Sakpal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Which term is better: SILS, SPA, LESS, E-NOTES, or TUES?

Authors:  Jiang Fan Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.