Literature DB >> 18458988

The value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in early active sacroiliitis.

Salih Ozgocmen1, Zulkif Bozgeyik, Mehtap Kalcik, Arafe Yildirim.   

Abstract

Detection of preradiographic sacroiliitis is important for early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and related spondyloarthropathies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in the early and active stages. The aim of this study is to assess the value of pain provocation tests in detecting early active sacroiliitis. Chronic low-back pain (LBP) patients were recruited and examined by blinded assessors for pain provocation tests: compression, distraction, Gaenslen, Mennel, Patrick, thigh thrust and sacral thrust tests. Patients underwent lumbar and sacroiliac MRI. The percentage of agreement for each pain provocation tests was between 72-95%, and the inter-rater reliability was from moderate to good (kappa, 0.43-0.87). Kappa values ranged from 0.43 to 0.60 with an agreement of 80-95% for clusters of pain provocation tests. As separately evaluated, pain provocation tests did not have favorable accuracy. When evaluated in clusters (out of three and five provocation tests) four positive over five tests on the left side reached an area under the curve 0.693 (95% CI 0.489-0.897), and two positive over three tests reached an AUC 0.697 (95% CI 0.484-0.910). Sacroiliac pain provocation tests had acceptable reliability in early active sacroiliitis; however, the discriminating capacity of these tests is poor. A multi-test regimen of three or five sacroiliac pain provocation tests may improve the accuracy of these tests discriminating sacroiliitis from LBP of mechanical origin. Four out of five selected tests or any of the two out of three selected tests have the highest predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458988     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-008-0907-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  20 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria?

Authors:  Martin Rudwaleit; Muhammad A Khan; Joachim Sieper
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-04

Review 2.  The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies.

Authors:  J Braun; J Sieper
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis--a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  U Blum; C Buitrago-Tellez; A Mundinger; T Krause; J Laubenberger; P Vaith; H H Peter; M Langer
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Histopathologic evidence that sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis is not merely enthesitis.

Authors:  R J François; D L Gardner; E J Degrave; E G Bywaters
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-09

5.  Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Martin Rudwaleit; Anke Metter; Joachim Listing; Joachim Sieper; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-02

6.  The reliability of multitest regimens with sacroiliac pain provocation tests.

Authors:  Dirk J Kokmeyer; Peter Van der Wurff; Geert Aufdemkampe; Theresa C M Fickenscher
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Jens Ivar Brox; Roar Robinson; Elisabeth Bjelland; Stein Solem; Trym Telje
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-07-12

8.  How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early.

Authors:  M Rudwaleit; D van der Heijde; M A Khan; J Braun; J Sieper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Jason Stuber
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2007-03

10.  Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT.

Authors:  K Bøcker Puhakka; A G Jurik; N Egund; B Schiottz-Christensen; K Stengaard-Pedersen; G van Overeem Hansen; J Vallø Christiansen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis of a patient with low back and toe pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cooper Wahl; David Smith; Mary Sesto; William Boissonnault
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

2.  Sacroiliac indicis increase the specificity of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis.

Authors:  Zehra Pınar Koç; Arzu Kin Cengiz; Funda Aydın; Nehir Samancı; Veli Yazısız; Süleyman Serdar Koca; Binnur Karayalçın
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 3.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Role of Physical Evaluation in the Early Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Research Proposal.

Authors:  Marcelo P Castro; Simon M Stebbings; Stephan Milosavljevic; Melanie D Bussey
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-20

5.  The Role of Sacroiliac Joint Steroid Injections in the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Serdar Kokar; Önder Kayhan; Savaş Şencan; Osman Hakan Gündüz
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.472

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.