Literature DB >> 18458262

Effect of different angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors on mortality among elderly patients with congestive heart failure.

Louise Pilote1, Michal Abrahamowicz, Mark Eisenberg, Karin Humphries, Hassan Behlouli, Jack V Tu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing clinical trial data do not address whether all angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are similarly beneficial in improving survival and reducing the rate of readmission among patients with congestive heart failure. We sought to answer this question using administrative databases from Canada's 3 most populous provinces.
METHODS: Using linked hospital discharge and prescription claims databases in Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, we identified all patients 65 years or older who were admitted to hospital because of congestive heart failure between Jan. 1, 1998, and Mar. 31, 2002, and who had not been admitted for the same reason in the 3 years preceding the study period. We analyzed the association between the type of ACE inhibitor prescribed within 30 days after discharge and subsequent mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. We then adjusted for demographic, clinical, physician and hospital-related variables, with additional time-dependent variables representing current drug use and dosage. We chose ramipril as the reference category for comparison with the other ACE inhibitors because it has increasingly been prescribed to patients with congestive heart failure.
RESULTS: A total of 43 316 patients with congestive heart failure filled prescriptions for ACE inhibitors within 30 days after discharge from hospital. Demographic, clinical and prescription-related characteristics were similar among users of each type of ACE inhibitor. In the time-dependent model, the mortality associated with 5 ACE inhibitors was similar to that with ramipril: adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 0.95 (0.89-1.02) for lisinopril, 0.92 (0.85-1.00) for fosinopril, 0.99 (0.88-1.11) for quinapril, 0.90 (0.77-1.06) for perindopril and 1.00 (0.80-1.24) for cilazapril. However, use of enalapril or captopril was associated with higher mortality compared with ramipril: adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% CIs) were 1.10 (1.04-1.16) for enalapril and 1.13 (1.01-1.26) for captopril.
INTERPRETATION: When prescribing ACE inhibitors to patients, physicians should consider a possible 10%-15% increase in mortality with captopril and enalapril compared with ramipril among patients with congestive heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458262      PMCID: PMC2335176          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  31 in total

1.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Survival bias associated with time-to-treatment initiation in drug effectiveness evaluation: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Zheng Zhou; Elham Rahme; Michal Abrahamowicz; Louise Pilote
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Are all angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors interchangeable?

Authors:  C D Furberg; B Pitt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Coding accuracy of hospital discharge data for elderly survivors of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A R Levy; R M Tamblyn; D Fitchett; P J McLeod; J A Hanley
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Temporal changes in the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, 1992-1996.

Authors:  J V Tu; C D Naylor; P Austin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: are their benefits a class effect or do individual agents differ?

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Impact of ramipril versus other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on outcome of unselected patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harm Wienbergen; Rudolf Schiele; Anselm Kai Gitt; Claus Juenger; Tobias Heer; Christina Meisenzahl; Helmut Landgraf; Claus Bossaller; Jochen Senges
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Simultaneous modelling of operative mortality and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  M Ghahramani; C B Dean; J J Spinelli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Double-blind comparison between zofenopril and lisinopril in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation-2 (SMILE-2) study.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Ettore Ambrosioni
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Prognosis and determinants of survival in patients newly hospitalized for heart failure: a population-based study.

Authors:  Philip Jong; Erika Vowinckel; Peter P Liu; Yanyan Gong; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Aug 12-26
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and pitfalls of cardiovascular medication in seniors.

Authors:  Hana Matejovska Kubesova; Pavel Weber; Hana Meluzinova; Katarina Bielakova; Jan Matejovsky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Long-term trends in use of and expenditures for cardiovascular medications in Canada.

Authors:  Cynthia A Jackevicius; Jafna L Cox; Daniel Carreon; Jack V Tu; Stéphane Rinfret; Derek So; Helen Johansen; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Virginie Demers; Karin Humphries; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  beta-Adrenergic receptor blockers and heart failure risk after myocardial infarction: a critical review.

Authors:  Robert H Neumayr; Paul J Hauptman
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-12

4.  Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: is an ACE always an ace?

Authors:  Adrian F Hernandez; Robert A Harrington
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Perindopril vs Enalapril in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Authors:  James J DiNicolantonio; Tian Hu; Carl J Lavie; James H O'Keefe; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Is Entresto good for the brain?

Authors:  Nirav Patel; Jason Gluck
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 7.  Efficacy and Safety of Zofenopril Versus Ramipril in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: A Review of the Published and Unpublished Data of the Randomized Double-Blind SMILE-4 Study.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Stefano Omboni; Salvatore Novo; Dragos Vinereanu; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Ettore Ambrosioni
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 8.  Perindopril: do randomised, controlled trials support an ACE inhibitor class effect? A meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  J R Snyman; F Wessels
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 9.  Development and Clinical Application of Phosphorus-Containing Drugs.

Authors:  Hanxiao Yu; He Yang; Enxue Shi; Wenjun Tang
Journal:  Med Drug Discov       Date:  2020-08-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.