BACKGROUND: Although cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition is regarded as a promising strategy to reduce atherosclerosis by increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the CETP inhibitor torcetrapib given in addition to atorvastatin had no effect on atherosclerosis and even increased cardiovascular death in the recent Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events trial. Therefore, we evaluated the antiatherogenic potential and adverse effects of torcetrapib in humanized APOE*3-Leiden.CETP (E3L.CETP) mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: E3L.CETP mice were fed a cholesterol-rich diet without drugs or with torcetrapib (12 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), atorvastatin (2.8 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), or both for 14 weeks. Torcetrapib decreased CETP activity in both the absence and presence of atorvastatin (-74% and -73%, respectively; P<0.001). Torcetrapib decreased plasma cholesterol (-20%; P<0.01), albeit to a lesser extent than atorvastatin (-42%; P<0.001) or the combination of torcetrapib and atorvastatin (-40%; P<0.001). Torcetrapib increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the absence (30%) and presence (34%) of atorvastatin. Torcetrapib and atorvastatin alone reduced atherosclerotic lesion size (-43% and -46%; P<0.05), but combination therapy did not reduce atherosclerosis compared with atorvastatin alone. Remarkably, compared with atorvastatin, torcetrapib enhanced monocyte recruitment and expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and resulted in lesions of a more inflammatory phenotype, as reflected by an increased macrophage content and reduced collagen content. CONCLUSIONS: CETP inhibition by torcetrapib per se reduces atherosclerotic lesion size but does not enhance the antiatherogenic potential of atorvastatin. However, compared with atorvastatin, torcetrapib introduces lesions of a less stable phenotype.
BACKGROUND: Although cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition is regarded as a promising strategy to reduce atherosclerosis by increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the CETP inhibitor torcetrapib given in addition to atorvastatin had no effect on atherosclerosis and even increased cardiovascular death in the recent Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events trial. Therefore, we evaluated the antiatherogenic potential and adverse effects of torcetrapib in humanized APOE*3-Leiden.CETP (E3L.CETP) mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: E3L.CETP mice were fed a cholesterol-rich diet without drugs or with torcetrapib (12 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), atorvastatin (2.8 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), or both for 14 weeks. Torcetrapib decreased CETP activity in both the absence and presence of atorvastatin (-74% and -73%, respectively; P<0.001). Torcetrapib decreased plasma cholesterol (-20%; P<0.01), albeit to a lesser extent than atorvastatin (-42%; P<0.001) or the combination of torcetrapib and atorvastatin (-40%; P<0.001). Torcetrapib increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the absence (30%) and presence (34%) of atorvastatin. Torcetrapib and atorvastatin alone reduced atherosclerotic lesion size (-43% and -46%; P<0.05), but combination therapy did not reduce atherosclerosis compared with atorvastatin alone. Remarkably, compared with atorvastatin, torcetrapib enhanced monocyte recruitment and expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and resulted in lesions of a more inflammatory phenotype, as reflected by an increased macrophage content and reduced collagen content. CONCLUSIONS: CETP inhibition by torcetrapib per se reduces atherosclerotic lesion size but does not enhance the antiatherogenic potential of atorvastatin. However, compared with atorvastatin, torcetrapib introduces lesions of a less stable phenotype.
Authors: Brandon Ason; José W A van der Hoorn; Joyce Chan; Edward Lee; Elsbet J Pieterman; Kathy Khanh Nguyen; Mei Di; Susan Shetterly; Jie Tang; Wen-Chen Yeh; Margrit Schwarz; J Wouter Jukema; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Hans M G Princen; Simon Jackson Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Wen Liang; Lars Verschuren; Petra Mulder; José W A van der Hoorn; Joanne Verheij; Andrea D van Dam; Mariette R Boon; Hans M G Princen; Louis M Havekes; Robert Kleemann; Anita M van den Hoek Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Viktor Hamrefors; Marju Orho-Melander; Ronald M Krauss; Bo Hedblad; Peter Almgren; Göran Berglund; Olle Melander Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: J W A van der Hoorn; J W Jukema; L M Havekes; E Lundholm; G Camejo; P C N Rensen; H M G Princen Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Y Wang; E T Parlevliet; J J Geerling; S J L van der Tuin; H Zhang; V Bieghs; A H M Jawad; R Shiri-Sverdlov; I Bot; S C A de Jager; L M Havekes; J A Romijn; K Willems van Dijk; P C N Rensen Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: David M Tehrani; Julius M Gardin; David Yanez; Calvin H Hirsch; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Phyllis K Stein; Nathan D Wong Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.162