Literature DB >> 18457617

[Efficacy of an intensive prevention programme of coronary heart disease: 5 year follow-up outcomes].

Miguel A Muñoz1, Isaac Subirana, Rafael Ramos, Alicia Franzi, Joan Vila, Jaume Marrugat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Most evidence on the efficacy of intensive preventive programs of secondary prevention of coronary diseases comes from Anglo-Saxon countries and effectiveness remains controversial. We have scarce information about the efficacy of these types of programs in Spain. In the present analysis we show the results of the ICAR (Intervención en la Comunidad de Alto Riesgo coronario) study, aimed to analyze the efficacy of an intensive preventive program primary care based in reducing the cardiovascular recurrences and mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: We designed a randomized clinical trial, multicenter and community based, which included 23 health care areas in Catalonia, Spain. We followed for 5 years 2 cohorts of patients with coronary heart disease, aged 30-80 years. The intervention group was quarterly examined by their general practitioner, who adjusted treatments to control their cardiovascular risk factors thoroughly and reinforced life style behaviours. In order to do that, patient's weight and blood pressure were determined in each visit and laboratory test carried out twice a year. Patients in the control group received the usual care. In order to analyze the effect of the intervention cardiovascular recurrences and mortality were registered.
RESULTS: We included 983 patients. Mean (standard deviation) age was 64 (10) and 74.5% were men. During the follow-up 235 patients suffered some non-fatal cardiovascular recurrence (109 vs 126 in the control and intervention group, respectively; p = 0.84), and 45 died from cardiovascular recurrences (23 vs 22, respectively; p = 0.57). Adjusted hazard ratio of cardiovascular event and total mortality, for the intervention group were 1.01 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.39), and 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.56), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an intensive secondary prevention program based on periodical reminds to patients with stable coronary heart disease to attend their general practitioners did not reduce either the cardiovascular recurrences or mortality at 5 years as compared with usual care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18457617     DOI: 10.1157/13119713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   1.725


  3 in total

Review 1.  Primary care organisational interventions for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edel Murphy; Akke Vellinga; Molly Byrne; Margaret E Cupples; Andrew W Murphy; Brian Buckley; Susan M Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Lipid-lowering drugs in ischaemic heart disease: a quasi-experimental uncontrolled before-and-after study of the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Rosa Dalmau; Miriam Boira; Carina Aguilar; Carlos López; Dolors Rodríguez; Delicia Gentille; Domingo Bofill; Eduard Diogene; Josep M Pepió
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Six-year follow-up of the SPHERE RCT: secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice.

Authors:  A W Murphy; M E Cupples; E Murphy; J Newell; C J Scarrott; A Vellinga; P Gillespie; M Byrne; C Kearney; S M Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.