Literature DB >> 18457512

Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.

Jennifer T Coull1, Bruno Nazarian, Franck Vidal.   

Abstract

The temporal discrimination paradigm requires subjects to compare the duration of a probe stimulus to that of a sample previously stored in working or long-term memory, thus providing an index of timing that is independent of a motor response. However, the estimation process itself comprises several component cognitive processes, including timing, storage, retrieval, and comparison of durations. Previous imaging studies have attempted to disentangle these components by simply measuring brain activity during early versus late scanning epochs. We aim to improve the temporal resolution and precision of this approach by using rapid event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to time-lock the hemodynamic response to presentation of the sample and probe stimuli themselves. Compared to a control (color-estimation) task, which was matched in terms of difficulty, sustained attention, and motor preparation requirements, we found selective activation of the left putamen for the storage ("encoding") of stimulus duration into working memory (WM). Moreover, increased putamen activity was linked to enhanced timing performance, suggesting that the level of putamen activity may modulate the depth of temporal encoding. Retrieval and comparison of stimulus duration in WM selectively activated the right superior temporal gyrus. Finally, the supplementary motor area was equally active during both sample and probe stages of the task, suggesting a fundamental role in timing the duration of a stimulus that is currently unfolding in time.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18457512     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  52 in total

1.  fMRI identifies the right inferior frontal cortex as the brain region where time interval processing is altered by negative emotional arousal.

Authors:  Micha Pfeuty; Bixente Dilharreguy; Loïc Gerlier; Michèle Allard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Tuning-in to the beat: Aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost.

Authors:  Katja Kornysheva; D Yves von Cramon; Thomas Jacobsen; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural modulation of temporal encoding, maintenance, and decision processes.

Authors:  Deborah L Harrington; Janice L Zimbelman; Sean C Hinton; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Amygdala responses to averted vs direct gaze fear vary as a function of presentation speed.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert G Franklin; Kestutis Kveraga; Nalini Ambady; Robert E Kleck; Paul J Whalen; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Anthony J Nelson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Harriet Lloyd; Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance.

Authors:  Melissa J Allman; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.

Authors:  Tiffany Galtress; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Multisensory perceptual learning of temporal order: audiovisual learning transfers to vision but not audition.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ready...go: Amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chess Stetson; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.