OBJECTIVES: This article describes an algorithm to classify respondents to cycle 1.1 (2000/2001) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) according to whether they have type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes. DATA SOURCE: The data are from the chronic disease module and the drug module of cycle 1.1 of the CCHS. ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES: A total of 6,361 respondents to cycle 1.1 of the CCHS reported that a health care professional had diagnosed them as having diabetes. The Ng-Dasgupta-Johnson algorithm classifies this group according to whether they have type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes, based on their answers to CCHS questions about diabetes during pregnancy, use of oral medications to control diabetes, use of insulin, timing of initiation of insulin treatment, and age at diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS: Application of an earlier algorithm to CCHS cycle 1.1 results in a 10%-90% split for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. By contrast, the Ng-Dasgupta-Johnson algorithm yields a 5%-95% split. This is not unreasonable, given the rapid rise in obesity, a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes, in Canada.
OBJECTIVES: This article describes an algorithm to classify respondents to cycle 1.1 (2000/2001) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) according to whether they have type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes. DATA SOURCE: The data are from the chronic disease module and the drug module of cycle 1.1 of the CCHS. ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES: A total of 6,361 respondents to cycle 1.1 of the CCHS reported that a health care professional had diagnosed them as having diabetes. The Ng-Dasgupta-Johnson algorithm classifies this group according to whether they have type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes, based on their answers to CCHS questions about diabetes during pregnancy, use of oral medications to control diabetes, use of insulin, timing of initiation of insulin treatment, and age at diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS: Application of an earlier algorithm to CCHS cycle 1.1 results in a 10%-90% split for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. By contrast, the Ng-Dasgupta-Johnson algorithm yields a 5%-95% split. This is not unreasonable, given the rapid rise in obesity, a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes, in Canada.
Authors: Jacquelyn J Cragg; Vanessa K Noonan; Marcel Dvorak; Andrei Krassioukov; G B John Mancini; Jaimie F Borisoff Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: B Cord Lethebe; Tyler Williamson; Stephanie Garies; Kerry McBrien; Charles Leduc; Sonia Butalia; Boglarka Soos; Marta Shaw; Neil Drummond Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-05-06
Authors: Michael Klompas; Emma Eggleston; Jason McVetta; Ross Lazarus; Lingling Li; Richard Platt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jennifer G Nooney; M Sue Kirkman; Kai McKeever Bullard; Zachary White; Kristi Meadows; Joanne R Campione; Russ Mardon; Gonzalo Rivero; Stephen R Benoit; Emily Pfaff; Deborah Rolka; Sharon Saydah Journal: J Clin Transl Endocrinol Date: 2020-07-03