Literature DB >> 18456884

The landing-take-off asymmetry of human running is enhanced in old age.

G A Cavagna1, M A Legramandi, L A Peyré-Tartaruga.   

Abstract

The landing-take-off asymmetry of running was thought to derive from, or at least to be consistent with, the physiological property of muscle to resist stretching (after landing) with a force greater than it can develop during shortening (before take-off). In old age, muscular force is reduced, but the deficit in force is less during stretching than during shortening. The greater loss in concentric versus eccentric strength with aging led us to hypothesize that older versus younger adults would increase the landing-take-off asymmetry in running. To test this hypothesis, we measured the within-step changes in mechanical energy of the centre of mass of the body in old and young subjects. The difference between the peaks in kinetic energy attained during the fall and during the lift of the centre of mass is greater in the old subjects. The difference between the time to lift and accelerate the centre of mass (positive work) and to absorb the same amount of energy during the downward displacement (negative work) is also greater in the old subjects. Both these findings imply a difference in force between stretching and shortening during the bounce, which is greater in the old subjects than in the young subjects. This is qualitatively consistent with the more asymmetric force-velocity relation found in aged muscle and supports, even if does not prove, the hypothesis that the landing-take-off asymmetry in running derives from the different response of muscle to stretching and shortening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456884     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.013805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  The two asymmetries of the bouncing step.

Authors:  Giovanni A Cavagna
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  A New Direction to Athletic Performance: Understanding the Acute and Longitudinal Responses to Backward Running.

Authors:  Aaron Uthoff; Jon Oliver; John Cronin; Craig Harrison; Paul Winwood
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Running backwards: soft landing-hard takeoff, a less efficient rebound.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M A Legramandi; A La Torre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Running humans attain optimal elastic bounce in their teens.

Authors:  Mario A Legramandi; Bénédicte Schepens; Giovanni A Cavagna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gomes da Rosa; Henrique Bianchi Oliveira; Natalia Andrea Gomeñuka; Marcos Paulo Bienert Masiero; Edson Soares da Silva; Ana Paula Janner Zanardi; Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho; Pedro Schons; Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Predicting Temporal Gait Kinematics: Anthropometric Characteristics and Global Running Pattern Matter.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Cyrille Gindre; Laurent Mourot
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  A Single Sacral-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit to Estimate Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force, Contact Time, and Flight Time in Running.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Bastiaan Breine; Cyrille Gindre; Davide Malatesta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  The bounce of the body in hopping, running and trotting: different machines with the same motor.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M A Legramandi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.