Literature DB >> 18456687

Targeting health visitor care: lessons from Starting Well.

C M Wright1, S K Jeffrey, M K Ross, L Wallis, R Wood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: UK child health promotion guidelines expect health visitors to assess family needs before new babies are aged 4 months and offer targeted care on that basis thereafter. Data from an intensive family support programme were used to assess how accurately family needs can be predicted at this stage.
DESIGN: A population based cohort of 1202 families with new babies receiving an intensive health visiting programme. Analysis of routinely recorded data.
SETTING: Starting Well project, Glasgow, UK. PREDICTORS: Health visitor rating of family needs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Families receiving high visiting rates or referred to social work services.
RESULTS: Of 302 families rated high need, only 143 (47%) were identified by age 4 months. Visiting rates in the first year for those initially rated high need were nearly double those for the remainder, but around two thirds of those with high contact rates/referred to social work were not initially rated high need. Six family characteristics (no income, baby born preterm, multiple pregnancy, South Asian, prior social work/criminal justice involvement, either parent in care as a child) were identified as the commonest/strongest predictors of contact rates; 1003 (83%) families had one such characteristics and/or lived in a highly deprived area, including 228 (93%) of those with high contact rates and 157 (96%) of those referred to social work.
CONCLUSIONS: Most families at risk will not be identified on an individual basis in the early weeks. Most families in deprived areas need continued input if the most vulnerable families are to be reliably identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456687     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2007.136465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  2 in total

1.  Language delay is not predictable from available risk factors.

Authors:  Philip Wilson; Fiona McQuaige; Lucy Thompson; Alex McConnachie
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-21

2.  A cross-sectional pilot study of the Scottish early development instrument: a tool for addressing inequality.

Authors:  Lisa Marks Woolfson; Rosemary Geddes; Stephanie McNicol; Josephine N Booth; John Frank
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.