Literature DB >> 18455818

Effect of environmental factors and cell physiological state on Pulsed Electric Fields resistance and repair capacity of various strains of Escherichia coli.

M Somolinos1, D García, P Mañas, S Condón, R Pagán.   

Abstract

The aim was to determine the resistance variation of four strains of Escherichia coli to Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF), the role of the sigma factor RpoS in PEF resistance, as well as the influence of several environmental factors and the cell physiological state on the PEF resistance and repair capacity. The rpoS null mutant, E. coli BJ4L1, exhibited decreased PEF resistance as compared with its wild-type parent, BJ4. W3110 and O157:H7 were the most PEF-resistant strains: whereas 2 and more than 3 Log10 cycles of BJ4 and BJ4L1 cells, respectively, were inactivated after 50 pulses at 35 kV/cm, only 0.5 Log10 cycle of inactivation of W3110 and O157:H7 was attained. A different pattern was observed and the resistance variation among strains was largely reduced, when selective recovery media were used. At exponential growth phase, the resistance of the four strains was lower, and more than 4 Log10 cycles of inactivation of all strains tested were attained at 30 kV/cm. Previous heat and cold shock treatments scarcely influenced cell PEF resistance. PEF survival increased with the reduction in water activity of the treatment medium to 0.94: the occurrence of sublethally injured cells was negligible, and less than 1 Log10 cycle of inactivation was attained at 35 kV/cm. PEF-treated cells were sensitive to a subsequent storage at pH 4.0 or in the presence of sorbic acid, attaining a final inactivation of 4-5 Log10 cycles after 24 hour-incubation. In conclusion, the work confirms the role of rpoS in PEF resistance. E. coli strains exhibit large differences in PEF resistance. These differences were less important when cells were recovered under selective conditions. Both resistance variation among strains and occurrence of sublethal damage were noticeably influenced by the environmental factors tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455818     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  6 in total

1.  Listeria monocytogenes cell wall constituents exert a charge effect on electroporation threshold.

Authors:  Alex Golberg; Chris S Rae; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-11-09

Review 2.  Comparative Resistance of Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens to Non-thermal Technologies for Food Preservation.

Authors:  Guillermo Cebrián; Pilar Mañas; Santiago Condón
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Antimicrobial Activity and Possible Mechanism of Action of Citral against Cronobacter sakazakii.

Authors:  Chao Shi; Kaikuo Song; Xiaorong Zhang; Yi Sun; Yue Sui; Yifei Chen; Zhenyu Jia; Huihui Sun; Zheng Sun; Xiaodong Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modular Serial Flow Through device for pulsed electric field treatment of the liquid samples.

Authors:  Maša Kandušer; Aleš Belič; Selma Čorović; Igor Škrjanc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Mechanism of bacterial inactivation by (+)-limonene and its potential use in food preservation combined processes.

Authors:  Laura Espina; Tilahun K Gelaw; Sílvia de Lamo-Castellví; Rafael Pagán; Diego García-Gonzalo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Proteomics-Based Mechanistic Investigation of Escherichia coli Inactivation by Pulsed Electric Field.

Authors:  Zhenyu Liu; Lingying Zhao; Qin Zhang; Nan Huo; Xiaojing Shi; Linwei Li; Liyan Jia; Yuanyuan Lu; Yong Peng; Yanbo Song
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.