Literature DB >> 18455755

Monitoring success of remediation: seven case studies of moisture and mold damaged buildings.

Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnessy1, Anne Hyvärinen, Tuula Putus, Aino Nevalainen.   

Abstract

Based on seven case studies of buildings that underwent different degrees of moisture and mold damage remediation, we aimed to develop methodology for assessment of the success of the remediation process. Methods used in gauging the success included technical monitoring of performance of building structures and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, microbial monitoring of indoor air quality (IAQ), and health effects studies of building occupants. The assessment was based on measurable change in the situations before and after remediation. Based on technical monitoring, remediation was successful in three cases, with partial improvement noted in three cases, whereas no remediation was conducted in one case. Based on microbial monitoring, improvement was detected in one, partial improvement in two and no improvement in two cases, whereas no follow-up was conducted in two cases. Health effect studies (mainly self-reported health status) showed improvement in one case, partial improvement in two cases, and no improvement in two cases, whereas no follow-up was conducted in one case, and in one case, follow-up failed due to low response rate. The results illustrate that it is possible to monitor the effects of remediation using various metrics. However, in some cases, no improvement could be observed in IAQ or occupant health, even if the remediation was considered technically successful, i.e. the remediation was fully completed as recommended. This could be due to many reasons, including: 1) all damage may not have been addressed adequately; 2) IAQ or health may not have been perceived improved regardless of remediation; and/or 3) the methods used may not have been sensitive/specific enough to detect such improvement within the 6-12 months follow-up periods after completion of the remediation. There is a need to further develop tools for monitoring and assessment of the success of moisture damage remediation in buildings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455755     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review of health hazards and prevention measures for response and recovery workers and volunteers after natural disasters, flooding, and water damage: mold and dampness.

Authors:  Eckardt Johanning; Pierre Auger; Philip R Morey; Chin S Yang; Ed Olmsted
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  The influence of water activity and temperature on germination, growth and sporulation of Stachybotrys chartarum strains.

Authors:  Schale Frazer; Naresh Magan; David Aldred
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Asthma related to workplace dampness and impaired work ability.

Authors:  Kirsi Karvala; Henrik Nordman; Ritva Luukkonen; Jukka Uitti
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Visually observed mold and moldy odor versus quantitatively measured microbial exposure in homes.

Authors:  Tiina Reponen; Umesh Singh; Chris Schaffer; Stephen Vesper; Elisabet Johansson; Atin Adhikari; Sergey A Grinshpun; Reshmi Indugula; Patrick Ryan; Linda Levin; Grace Lemasters
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma.

Authors:  Riitta Sauni; Jos H Verbeek; Jukka Uitti; Merja Jauhiainen; Kathleen Kreiss; Torben Sigsgaard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-25

6.  Molecular profiling of fungal communities in moisture damaged buildings before and after remediation--a comparison of culture-dependent and culture-independent methods.

Authors:  Miia Pitkäranta; Teija Meklin; Anne Hyvärinen; Aino Nevalainen; Lars Paulin; Petri Auvinen; Ulla Lignell; Helena Rintala
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Changes in respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms in occupants of a large office building over a period of moisture damage remediation attempts.

Authors:  Ju-Hyeong Park; Sook Ja Cho; Sandra K White; Jean M Cox-Ganser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Response of Phagocytes to Indoor Air Toxicity.

Authors:  Liisa K Vilén; Janne Atosuo; Esa-Matti Lilius
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Comparing cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy and psychoeducation for non-specific symptoms associated with indoor air: a randomised control trial protocol.

Authors:  Sanna Selinheimo; Aki Vuokko; Markku Sainio; Kirsi Karvala; Hille Suojalehto; Heli Järnefelt; Tiina Paunio
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Ventilation Positive Pressure Intervention Effect on Indoor Air Quality in a School Building with Moisture Problems.

Authors:  Camilla Vornanen-Winqvist; Kati Järvi; Sander Toomla; Kaiser Ahmed; Maria A Andersson; Raimo Mikkola; Tamás Marik; László Kredics; Heidi Salonen; Jarek Kurnitski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.