Literature DB >> 18455717

FGF signals from the nasal pit are necessary for normal facial morphogenesis.

Heather L Szabo-Rogers1, Poongodi Geetha-Loganathan, Suresh Nimmagadda, Kathy K Fu, Joy M Richman.   

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are required for brain, pharyngeal arch, suture and neural crest cell development and mutations in the FGF receptors have been linked to human craniofacial malformations. To study the functions of FGF during facial morphogenesis we locally perturb FGF signalling in the avian facial prominences with FGFR antagonists, foil barriers and FGF2 protein. We tested 4 positions with antagonist-soaked beads but only one of these induced a facial defect. Embryos treated in the lateral frontonasal mass, adjacent to the nasal slit developed cleft beaks. The main mechanisms were a block in proliferation and an increase in apoptosis in those areas that were most dependent on FGF signaling. We inserted foil barriers with the goal of blocking diffusion of FGF ligands out of the lateral edge of the frontonasal mass. The barriers induced an upregulation of the FGF target gene, SPRY2 compared to the control side. Moreover, these changes in expression were associated with deletions of the lateral edge of the premaxillary bone. To determine whether we could replicate the effects of the foil by increasing FGF levels, beads soaked in FGF2 were placed into the lateral edge of the frontonasal mass. There was a significant increase in proliferation and an expansion of the frontonasal mass but the skeletal defects were minor and not the same as those produced by the foil. Instead it is more likely that the foil repressed FGF signaling perhaps mediated by the increase in SPRY2 expression. In summary, we have found that the nasal slit is a source of FGF signals and the function of FGF is to stimulate proliferation in the cranial frontonasal mass. The FGF independent regions correlate with those previously determined to be dependent on BMP signaling. We propose a new model whereby, FGF-dependent microenvironments exist in the cranial frontonasal mass and caudal maxillary prominence and these flank BMP-dependent regions. Coordination of the proliferation in these regions leads ultimately to normal facial morphogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455717     DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  43 in total

1.  Diversity in primary palate ontogeny of amniotes revealed with 3D imaging.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Beatrice Thivichon-Prince; Joy Marion Richman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Frontonasal Dysplasia: Towards an Understanding of Molecular and Developmental Aetiology.

Authors:  Peter G Farlie; Naomi L Baker; Patrick Yap; Tiong Y Tan
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-10-29

Review 3.  Recent insights into the morphological diversity in the amniote primary and secondary palates.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Joy Marion Richman
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 4.  Neural crest cell signaling pathways critical to cranial bone development and pathology.

Authors:  Yuji Mishina; Taylor Nicholas Snider
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Embryonic bauplans and the developmental origins of facial diversity and constraint.

Authors:  Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Alexis J Lainoff; Francis J Smith; Raul Diaz; Abigail S Tucker; Paul A Trainor; Richard A Schneider; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Differences in Cell Proliferation and Craniofacial Phenotype of Closely Related Species in the Pupfish Genus Cyprinodon.

Authors:  Ezra Lencer; Amy R McCune
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Systems biology of facial development: contributions of ectoderm and mesenchyme.

Authors:  Joan E Hooper; Weiguo Feng; Hong Li; Sonia M Leach; Tzulip Phang; Charlotte Siska; Kenneth L Jones; Richard A Spritz; Lawrence E Hunter; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Divergent palate morphology in turtles and birds correlates with differences in proliferation and BMP2 expression during embryonic development.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Kelvin Jia-Mien Leung; Joy Marion Richman
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.656

9.  Signaling integration in the rugae growth zone directs sequential SHH signaling center formation during the rostral outgrowth of the palate.

Authors:  Ian C Welsh; Timothy P O'Brien
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Fgf8 dosage determines midfacial integration and polarity within the nasal and optic capsules.

Authors:  John N Griffin; Claudia Compagnucci; Diane Hu; Jennifer Fish; Ophir Klein; Ralph Marcucio; Michael J Depew
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.