Literature DB >> 18455638

A single-center experience treating renal malperfusion after aortic dissection with central aortic fenestration and renal artery stenting.

Dawn M Barnes1, David M Williams, Narasimham L Dasika, Himanshu J Patel, Alan B Weder, James C Stanley, G Michael Deeb, Gilbert R Upchurch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with aortic dissection were studied to define (1) anatomic and physiologic derangements in renal artery blood flow, (2) differences in clinically suspected renal malperfusion and true functional malperfusion, and (3) variations in endovascular interventions for the treatment of renal malperfusion.
METHODS: The cohort comprised 165 patients (mean age, 58 years) with dissections who were thought to have malperfusion sufficient to require arteriography. They were treated from 1996 to 2004 for acute (n = 115) or chronic (n = 50) aortic dissections (75 had type A, 90 had type B lesions). All patients had suspected peripheral vascular malperfusion (ie, cerebral, spinal, mesenteric, renal, or lower extremity vascular beds). Renal malperfusion was suspected in 88 patients secondary to worsening hypertension (n = 34), evolving renal insufficiency (n = 37), computed tomography evidence of impaired renal blood flow (n = 13), or a combination of factors (n = 4). Patients underwent angiographic and intravascular ultrasound studies. Renal malperfusion was confirmed with a systolic gradient between the aortic root and renal hilum (average, 44 mm Hg).
RESULTS: Right renal arteries arose exclusively from the true lumen in 115 patients (70%), the false lumen in 11 (7%), and both lumens in 37 (23%). Left renal arteries arose exclusively from the true lumen in 69 patients (42%), the false lumen in 32 (20%), and both lumens in 62 (38%). Angiographic confirmation of malperfusion existed in 59 patients (67%) of the 88 suspected of such, and in 31 patients (39%) of the 79 with suspected malperfusion of nonrenal tissues. Of the 90 patients with confirmed renal malperfusion, 71 underwent endovascular therapy, including isolated renal artery stenting (n = 31), as well as proximal aortic fenestration with or without aortic stenting (n = 24), or both renal and aortic intervention (n = 16). Residual pressure gradients averaged 8.1 mm Hg after these interventions. Five procedure-related complications (7%) occurred. The periprocedural postintervention mortality rate was 21% (n = 15), including multisystem organ failure (n = 7), false lumen rupture (n = 3), reperfusion injury (n = 2), cerebral ischemia (n = 1), cardiac arrest (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous aortic fenestration and renal artery stenting are both technically feasible and associated with an acceptable complication rate. Most patients respond well symptomatically, obviating the need for immediate surgical relief of renal artery obstruction and allowing for renal malperfusion recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  Renovascular hypertension: endovascular therapy in complicated aortic Stanford type B dissection.

Authors:  Janosch Cupa; Hans-Jörg Hippe; Philipp Schäfer; Norbert Frey; Christoph Langer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Malperfusion syndromes in aortic dissections.

Authors:  Todd C Crawford; Robert J Beaulieu; Bryan A Ehlert; Elizabeth V Ratchford; James H Black
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Imaging features of renal malperfusion in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Pieter A J van Bakel; Matthew Henry; Karen M Kim; Bo Yang; Joost A van Herwaarden; C Alberto Figueroa; Himanshu J Patel; David M Williams; Nicholas S Burris
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Observational study of mortality risk stratification by ischemic presentation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: the Penn classification.

Authors:  John G T Augoustides; Arnar Geirsson; Wilson Y Szeto; Elizabeth K Walsh; Brittany Cornelius; Alberto Pochettino; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-12-09

5.  Update in the management of aortic dissection.

Authors:  Jip L Tolenaar; Guido H W van Bogerijen; Kim A Eagle; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-04

6.  Risk factors of acute kidney injury in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the renal artery who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Xiuping An; Xi Guo; Nan Ye; Weijing Bian; Xiaofeng Han; Guoqin Wang; Hong Cheng
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  Treatment of acute aortic dissection type A with paraplegia and distal limb ischemia within a hybrid operating room.

Authors:  Venny Lise Kvalheim; Maria Devold Soknes; Guttorm Lysvold Jenssen; Rune Haaverstad
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.