Literature DB >> 18455324

Beam path toxicities to non-target structures during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

David I Rosenthal1, Mark S Chambers, Clifton D Fuller, Neal C S Rebueno, John Garcia, Merrill S Kies, William H Morrison, K Kian Ang, Adam S Garden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams traverse nontarget normal structures not irradiated during three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). This study estimates the doses and toxicities to nontarget structures during IMRT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oropharyngeal cancer IMRT and 3D-CRT cases were reviewed. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to evaluate radiation dose to the lip, cochlea, brainstem, occipital scalp, and segments of the mandible. Toxicity rates were compared for 3D-CRT, IMRT alone, or IMRT with concurrent cisplatin. Descriptive statistics and exploratory recursive partitioning analysis were used to estimate dose "breakpoints" associated with observed toxicities.
RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were evaluated for toxicity; 60 had detailed DVH evaluation and 15 had 3D-CRT plan comparison. Comparing IMRT with 3D-CRT, there was significant (p </= 0.002) nonparametric differential dose to all clinically significant structures of interest. Thirty percent of IMRT patients had headaches and 40% had occipital scalp alopecia. A total of 76% and 38% of patients treated with IMRT alone had nausea and vomiting, compared with 99% and 68%, respectively, of those with concurrent cisplatin. IMRT had a markedly distinct toxicity profile than 3D-CRT. In recursive partitioning analysis, National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria adverse effects 3.0 nausea and vomiting, scalp alopecia and anterior mucositis were associated with reconstructed mean brainstem dose >36 Gy, occipital scalp dose >30 Gy, and anterior mandible dose >34 Gy, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose reduction to specified structures during IMRT implies an increased beam path dose to alternate nontarget structures that may result in clinical toxicities that were uncommon with previous, less conformal approaches. These findings have implications for IMRT treatment planning and research, toxicity assessment, and multidisciplinary patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455324     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  52 in total

1.  Fatigue following radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal cancer survivors: A dosimetric analysis incorporating patient report and observer rating.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Development of a software for quantitative evaluation radiotherapy target and organ-at-risk segmentation comparison.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Musaddiq Awan; Steven Bedrick; Coen R N Rasch; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2015.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Sharon Spencer; David M Brizel; Barbara Burtness; Paul M Busse; Jimmy J Caudell; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Robert L Foote; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Antonio Jimeno; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Thomas McCaffrey; Loren K Mell; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Cristina P Rodriguez; Sandeep Samant; Jatin P Shah; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden; Sue S Yom; Nicole McMillian; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Dose-volume correlates of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in Oropharynx cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Results from a case-matched comparison.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Treatment of late sequelae after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Primož Strojan; Katherine A Hutcheson; Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan J Beitler; Johannes A Langendijk; Anne W M Lee; June Corry; William M Mendenhall; Robert Smee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

Authors:  Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; David Ly; Tu D Dan; John Ondos; Holly Ning; Arnaud Belard; John O'Connell; Robert W Miller; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma.

Authors:  G Brandon Gunn; Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; X Ronald Zhu; C David Fuller; Abdallah S Mohamed; William H Morrison; Jack Phan; Beth M Beadle; Heath D Skinner; Erich M Sturgis; Merrill S Kies; Kate A Hutcheson; David I Rosenthal; Radhe Mohan; Michael T Gillin; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Effect of brain stem and dorsal vagus complex dosimetry on nausea and vomiting in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Katherine Ciura; Michelle McBurney; Baongoc Nguyen; Mary Pham; Neal Rebueno; Clifton D Fuller; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Beam path toxicity in candidate organs-at-risk: assessment of radiation emetogenesis for patients receiving head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Esengul Kocak-Uzel; G Brandon Gunn; Rivka R Colen; Micheal E Kantor; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Sara Schoultz-Henley; Paniyotis Mavroidis; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; Beth M Beadle; William H Morrison; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.