Literature DB >> 18454991

Mycophenolate mofetil: ten years' experience of a renal transplant unit.

S Jorge1, J Guerra, A Santana, C Mil-Homens, M M Prata.   

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use in renal transplantation has allowed a significant decrease in early acute rejection rates. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of acute rejection episodes, renal function at the first year posttransplant, patient and graft survivals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rate, influence of the degree of sensitization, and number of MHC antigen mismatches on graft survival in two groups of patients receiving either MMF or azathioprine. Group 1 included 149 patients receiving cyclosporine, MMF, and prednisolone; group 2 included 191 patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, degree of sensitization (expressed as percentage of antibodies reactive to panel), MHC mismatch number, cold ischemia time, donor age, or anti-thymocyte globulin induction. In group 1 (MMF) there was a significant decrease in early acute rejection rate (19% vs 57%, P < .0001), longer graft survival at 10 years (92% vs 75%, P = .006), and higher rate of CMV infection (22% vs 12%, P = .004). Renal function at the first year posttransplant and patient survival during follow-up did not differ between the groups. The degree of sensitization influenced graft survival in group 2. The number of MHC mismatches did not influence graft survival in either group. With MMF, there was a significant reduction in early acute rejection rate, a significant increase in graft survival at 10-year follow-up, and diminished impact of the degree of sensitization on graft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454991     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  M L Ritter; L Pirofski
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Overview of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anjana A Pillai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nanodelivery of Mycophenolate Mofetil to the Organ Improves Transplant Vasculopathy.

Authors:  Mayuko Uehara; Baharak Bahmani; Liwei Jiang; Sungwook Jung; Naima Banouni; Vivek Kasinath; Zhabiz Solhjou; Jing Zhao; Farideh Ordikhani; Munhyung Bae; Nasim Annabi; Martina M McGrath; Reza Abdi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression: Infections.

Authors:  Guy Handley; Jonathan Hand
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

5.  The risk, prevention, and outcome of cytomegalovirus after pediatric lung transplantation.

Authors:  Lara A Danziger-Isakov; Sarah Worley; Marian G Michaels; Susana Arrigain; Paul Aurora; Manfred Ballmann; Debra Boyer; Carol Conrad; Irmgard Eichler; Okan Elidemir; Samuel Goldfarb; George B Mallory; Peter J Mogayzel; Daiva Parakininkas; Melinda Solomon; Gary Visner; Stuart Sweet; Albert Faro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.