| Literature DB >> 18454861 |
Kenneth H Huang1, Mona R Loutfy, Christos M Tsoukas, Nicole F Bernard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The advantage of treatment interruptions (TIs) in salvage therapy remains controversial. Regardless, characterizations of the correlates of CD4 count fall during TI are important to identify since patients with virologic failure commonly stop antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of pre-TI proliferative capacity and cell surface markers for CD4 count change in HIV-infected patients experiencing virologic failure before undergoing TI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18454861 PMCID: PMC2405786 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Panel A shows representative FACS contour plots gated on CD3+ lymphocytes showing CD4+ and CD8+ proliferative responses to no stimulation (negative control), SEB (superantigen), CMV (recall antigen) and Gag p55 peptide pool (HIV-specific antigens) for a patient with a CD4 count change during TI that was lower than the median for the group (Patient #3) in the left hand panels and a patient with a change in CD4 count during TI that was higher than the median for the group (Patient #1) in the right hand panels. The number in the box of each contour plot is the percentage of CFSElo cells, which is an indication of the level of proliferation that has occurred in response to that stimulus. In Panel B, results from all patients are plotted for which proliferation data was available. The percentage of CFSElo cells following stimulation is plotted on the y-axis and CD4 count change from baseline to nadir during TI on the x-axis. The left hand panels show the percentage of CFSElo cells in the CD4+ T cell compartment and the right hand panels the percentage of CFSElo cells in the CD8+ T cell compartment. The upper panels show proliferation to CMV lysate (n = 12) and the bottom panels to the HIV Gag p55 peptide pool (n = 13). Proliferation to CMV and the Gag p55 peptide pool was assessed on baseline time points. The line in each graph represents a trendline through the data points. Spearman nonparametric correlation tests were used to test the significance of the association between these parameters; and p values <0.05 were considered significant.
Correlation between baseline immunological parameters and CD4 count change from baseline to nadir during TI
| anti-CD3 | -0.07 (p = 0.87) | |
| SEB | 0.43 (p = 0.30) | |
| CMV | -0.59 (p = 0.045)*** | |
| Gag p55 peptide pool | -0.40 (p = 0.17) | |
| %CD57+ | -0.69 (p = 0.0095)*** | |
| CD57+ MFI | -0.03 (p = 0.93) | |
| %CD28 | -0.38 (p = 0.19) | |
| CD28+ MFI | -0.18 (p = 0.55) | |
| anti-CD3 | -0.09 (p = 0.81) | |
| SEB | 0.14 (p = 0.75) | |
| CMV | -0.48 (p = 0.12) | |
| Gag p55 peptide pool | -0.01 (p = 0.96) | |
| %CD57+ | 0.01 (p = 0.97) | |
| CD57+ MFI | 0.29 (p = 0.34) | |
| %CD28 | 0.33 (p = 0.27) | |
| CD28+ MFI | -0.10 (p = 0.73) | |
| Baseline CD4+ count | -0.61 (p = 0.030)*** | |
| Baseline viral load | -0.35 (p = 0.24) |
*CMV = cytomegalovirus lysate; SEB = streptococcus enterotoxin B; MFI = mean fluorescence intensity.
**Spearman nonparametric correlation test (p-value).
***p < 0.05
Figure 2Panel A shows FACS contour plots generated by staining PBMC from baseline time points from 2 study subjects. Shown are CD3+ lymphocytes staining positively for CD57 but negatively for CD8, i.e. CD4+CD57+ cells. The number in the box in each plot indicates the percentage of CD4+CD57+ lymphocytes. Patient #2 on the left had a CD4 T-cell change during TI that was below the median while patient #1 on the right had a CD4 T-cell change that was above the median for the group. Panel B shows the correlation between the percentage of CD4+CD57+ cells at baseline and CD4 count loss during TI for all 13 patients tested. Spearman nonparametric correlation tests were used to assess the significance of the association between these parameters; p values <0.05 were considered significant.