Literature DB >> 18454051

Sequential topoisomerase targeting and analysis of mechanisms of resistance to topotecan in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

Biren Saraiya1, Murugesan Gounder, Jayeeta Dutta, Ahamed Saleem, Celeste Collazo, Luz Zimmerman, Ahamed Nazar, Mecide Gharibo, Dale Schaar, Yong Lin, Weichung Shih, Joseph Aisner, Roger K Strair, Eric H Rubin.   

Abstract

Resistance to topoisomerase I (TOP1)-targeting drugs such as topotecan often involves upregulation of topoisomerase II (TOP2), with accompanying increased sensitivity to TOP2-targeting drugs such as etoposide. This trial was designed to investigate sequential topoisomerase targeting in the treatment of patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia. An initial cohort of patients received topotecan and cytosine arabinoside daily for 5 days. Serial samples of circulating mononuclear cells were examined to evaluate peak elevations of TOP2-alpha protein expression. In subsequent cohorts, etoposide was administered daily for 3 days, beginning 6 h after initiation of the topotecan infusion. The etoposide dose was escalated to determine a maximum-tolerated dose. Circulating mononuclear cells were analyzed for TOP1 mutations and ABCG2 protein expression. In addition, systemic and intracellular topotecan concentrations were measured. Thirty-one patients were enrolled. On the basis of TOP1-alpha protein levels in three patients with peripheral blast counts greater than 50%, etoposide administration began 6 h after initiation of the topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion. Using this schedule of administration, the maximum-tolerated dose of etoposide was 90 mg/m. No TOP1 mutations were identified, but increases in ABCG2 expression during the infusion were observed in mononuclear cells from two of four evaluable patients. Administration of etoposide 6 h after initiation of a topotecan/cytosine arabinoside infusion is feasible and is associated with clinical activity. Analysis of TOP2-alpha protein levels in this small number of patients indicated that peak increases occurred earlier than expected based on earlier publications. Upregulation of ABCG2 was detected in circulating cells and may represent an inducible form of drug resistance that should be investigated further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454051     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3282f5218b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  6 in total

Review 1.  Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  John L Nitiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  FL118, a novel camptothecin analogue, overcomes irinotecan and topotecan resistance in human tumor xenograft models.

Authors:  Xiang Ling; Xiaojun Liu; Kai Zhong; Nicholas Smith; Joshua Prey; Fengzhi Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Initial testing (stage 1) of the mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Stephen T Keir; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; Doris Phelps; John M Maris; Catherine Billups; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  E5501: phase II study of topotecan sequenced with etoposide/cisplatin, and irinotecan/cisplatin sequenced with etoposide for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Joseph Aisner; Xin Victoria Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Eric H Rubin; Suresh S Ramalingam; Murugesan Gounder; Paul Gregory Rausch; Rita S Axelrod; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Synthesis of novel 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin glycoside derivatives and investigation of their anti-tumor effects in vivo.

Authors:  Guanzhao Wu; Xiaoyuan Mai; Feng Liu; Mingming Lin; Xueyang Dong; Qingliang Xu; Cui Hao; Lijuan Zhang; Rilei Yu; Tao Jiang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  Kristian Brock; Victoria Homer; Gurjinder Soul; Claire Potter; Cody Chiuzan; Shing Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.