Literature DB >> 18453998

Preservation of contour in periorbital and midfacial craniofacial microsurgery: reconstruction of the soft-tissue elements and skeletal buttresses.

Eduardo D Rodriguez1, Rachel Bluebond-Langner, Julie E Park, Paul N Manson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microsurgical reconstructive algorithms for craniofacial defects have focused on soft-tissue flaps with or without conventional bone grafts. However, volumetric loss from muscle atrophy, bone resorption, and soft-tissue contraction limits long-term preservation of facial contour. Applying craniofacial principles of skeletal buttress support, the authors used composite vascularized bone flaps to reconstruct the soft tissue and the vertical and horizontal buttresses of the face. In this manner, facial proportions and aesthetics are maintained in composite tissue defects resulting from high-energy trauma or oncologic extirpation.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 31 patients with craniofacial defects treated by a single surgeon with composite bone flaps at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and The Johns Hopkins Hospital from 2001 to 2006. Charts were reviewed and data were collected on age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of defect, type of reconstructive procedure, and outcome.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with composite tissue loss, primarily men (n = 21) with an average age of 37.4 years, underwent reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps (25 fibula flaps and six iliac crest flaps). There were three cranial defects, eight periorbital defects, 17 maxillary defects, and three maxillary and periorbital defects. The flap survival rate was 93.5 percent, with an average follow-up of 13.5 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of facial height, width, and projection through skeletal buttress replacement is essential for achieving facial harmony. Since 2001, the authors' unit has pursued a paradigm shift with regard to treatment of composite oncologic or traumatic defects, advocating vascularized bone flaps to achieve excellent long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453998     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b13e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Versatility of subscapular chimeric free flaps in the secondary reconstruction of composite posttraumatic defects of the upper face.

Authors:  Mark Winston Stalder; Matthew Whitten Wise; Charles L Dupin; Hugo St Hilaire
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-08-06

2.  In vivo bone strain and finite-element modeling of the craniofacial haft in catarrhine primates.

Authors:  Callum F Ross; Michael A Berthaume; Paul C Dechow; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Laura B Porro; Brian G Richmond; Mark Spencer; David Strait
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Optimizing Reconstruction with Periorbital Transplantation: Clinical Indications and Anatomic Considerations.

Authors:  Michael Sosin; Gerhard S Mundinger; Amir H Dorafshar; Nicholas T Iliff; Joani M Christensen; Michael R Christy; Branko Bojovic; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  Management of High-energy Avulsive Ballistic Facial Injury: A Review of the Literature and Algorithmic Approach.

Authors:  Elbert E Vaca; Justin L Bellamy; Sammy Sinno; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-19

5.  Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome.

Authors:  Gautam Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  Buccal Fat Pad Flap, an Option for Surgical Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ernest Ahamiojie Ikekhuamen; Aminu Gambo; Benjamin Fomete; Desmond Agbonifo; Olalekan Yusuf
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2022-08-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.