Literature DB >> 18453941

The intercartilaginous graft for actual and potential alar retraction.

Ronald P Gruber1, Gil Kryger, David Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alar retraction deformities occasionally require significant soft-tissue release and relatively large cartilage grafts. In addition, correction of the short nose by only lengthening the septum can result in potential postoperative alar retraction. Consequently, both types of cases, true and potential alar retraction (in short noses), would benefit from a technique that lengthens the sidewall of the nose.
METHODS: The intercartilaginous graft technique is a modification of the lateral crural strut graft technique. An intercartilaginous graft is inserted between the upper lateral cartilage and what remains of the lateral crus (lateral crus element). The technique emphasizes maximum soft-tissue release to insert a cartilaginous graft that spans the gap between the upper lateral cartilage and the lateral crus element. The graft is inserted under slight tension to maintain maximum lengthening of the sidewall of the nose.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients had intercartilaginous grafts placed. Seven patients had actual alar retraction and six patients had short noses with potential alar retraction. There was no postoperative alar retraction in 10 patients. Two patients with actual alar retraction were not completely corrected, and one required surgical revision. One patient with a short nose exhibited postoperative alar retraction, but it was not significant enough to warrant reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: The intercartilaginous graft technique, a modification of the lateral crural strut graft technique, corrects moderate to severe alar retraction and prevents alar retraction after lengthening of very short noses. Its success depends on substantial soft-tissue release and insertion of a maximal sized graft between the upper lateral cartilage and the lateral crus element under slight tension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453941     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816c3b9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Correction of Alar Retraction Based on Frontal Classification.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Kim; Jin Woo Song; Sung Wan Park; Erica Bartlett; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Repositioned lateral crural flap technique for cephalic malposition in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  A Mohebbi; A Azizi; S Tabatabaiee
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Structural grafts and suture techniques in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Holger G Gassner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

4.  Simple Correction of Alar Retraction by Conchal Cartilage Extension Grafts.

Authors:  Yong Jun Jang; Sung Min Kim; Dae Hyun Lew; Seung Yong Song
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-11-18

Review 5.  Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges Crosara; Flávio Barbosa Nunes; Danilo Santana Rodrigues; Ana Rosa Pimentel Figueiredo; Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker; Celso Goncalves Becker; Roberto Eustáquio Santos Guimarães
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Correction of asian short nose with lower lateral cartilage repositioning and ear cartilage grafting.

Authors:  Jin Suk Byun; Kenneth K Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-10-07

7.  Correction of alar rim retraction by lateral crural extension graft.

Authors:  Tito Matteo Marianetti; Antonio Moretti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.