Literature DB >> 18453937

Long-term results following fronto-orbital reconstruction in nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis.

Jesse Creed Selber1, Christopher Brooks, Jibby E Kurichi, Traci Temmen, Seema S Sonnad, Linton A Whitaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fronto-orbital reconstruction is the standard of care for repair of unilateral coronal synostosis. This study examined the relationship between age at initial surgery and need for secondary surgery, to determine the optimal age for reconstruction.
METHODS: The series comprised 81 patients with unicoronal synostosis who underwent reconstruction over a 30-year period by a single surgeon. Measured outcomes included reoperation rate, relapse/defect rate, relapse interval, and problem rate.
RESULTS: Average age at surgery was 11.3 months (range, 1.5 to 71 months). The problem rate was 27.2 percent. Mean follow-up was 69 months (range, 6 to 234 months). The postoperative defect rate was 73 percent. Sixteen patients (20 percent) underwent reoperation to correct secondary deformities. Whitaker category I or II results were achieved in 90.1 percent. Problem rates for patients aged 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, and older than 12 months were 13.3, 28, and 35, respectively. Secondary surgery was performed in 40 percent of patients whose first surgery was at 0 to 6 months, 7 percent aged 6 to 12 months, and 30.4 percent older than 12 months. After surgery, 87 percent of patients aged 0 to 6 months, 95 percent aged 6 to 12 months, and 87 percent older than 12 months had Whitaker category I or II results.
CONCLUSIONS: Fronto-orbital advancement at younger than 6 months had the highest incidence of readvancement. Patients treated at 6 to 12 months had the least need for any secondary surgery; however, patients older than 12 months had the lowest incidence of readvancement. These results indicate that fronto-orbital advancement should be delayed until at least age 6 months to avoid relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453937     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816a9f88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

Review 1.  Posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Nicholas Bastidas; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Frontal-orbital advancement for the management of anterior plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Hamilton Matushita; Nivaldo Alonso; Daniel Dante Cardeal; Fernanda de Andrade
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The assessment of relationship between the skull base development and the severity of frontal plagiocephaly after bilateral fronto-orbital advancement in the early life.

Authors:  Tatsuki Oyoshi; Shingo Fujio; Manoj Bohara; Ryosuke Hanaya; Hiroshi Tokimura; Kazunori Arita
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Evaluation of Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy and Orthotic Therapy for Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Conor T Williams; David J Segar; Sybill D Naidoo; Gary B Skolnick; Mark R Proctor; Matthew D Smyth; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  3D morphological change of skull base and fronto-temporal soft-tissue in the patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis after fronto-orbital advancement.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Jian Ni; Binghang Li
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  PEEK Implant: A Case Report Illustrating the Benefits for Correcting Craniosynostosis Asymmetry.

Authors:  Ogaga Urhie; Walid Radwan; Brandon Lucke-Wold; T J Chin; Cesar Serrano
Journal:  Acta Sci Neurol       Date:  2018-11-02

7.  Secondary bicoronal synostosis after metopic craniosynostosis surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Arash Esmaeli; Farideh Nejat; Zohreh Habibi; Mostafa El Khashab
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

8.  Evaluation of Long-term Outcomes of Facial Sensation following Cranial Vault Reconstruction for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jana Dengler; Emily S Ho; Erin L Klar; John H Phillips; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-11

9.  The Directive Growth Approach for Nonsyndromic, Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Patient and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J Mann; Matthew P Fahrenkopf; Michael Burton; John Girotto; John Polley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  A 24-month cost and outcome analysis comparing traditional fronto-orbital advancment and remodeling with endoscopic strip craniectomy and molding helmet in the management of unicoronal craniosynostosis: A retrospective bi-institutional review.

Authors:  B A Jivraj; N Ahmed; K Karia; R Menon; E Robertson; A Sodha; J C R Wormald; J O'hara; O Jeelani; D Dunaway; G James; J Ong
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2019-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.