Literature DB >> 18453465

Situating social influence processes: dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks.

Winter A Mason1, Frederica R Conrey, Eliot R Smith.   

Abstract

Social psychologists have studied the psychological processes involved in persuasion, conformity, and other forms of social influence, but they have rarely modeled the ways influence processes play out when multiple sources and multiple targets of influence interact over time. However, workers in other fields from sociology and economics to cognitive science and physics have recognized the importance of social influence and have developed models of influence flow in populations and groups-generally without relying on detailed social psychological findings. This article reviews models of social influence from a number of fields, categorizing them using four conceptual dimensions to delineate the universe of possible models. The goal is to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations to build models that incorporate the detailed, microlevel understanding of influence processes derived from focused laboratory studies but contextualized in ways that recognize how multidirectional, dynamic influences are situated in people's social networks and relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18453465     DOI: 10.1177/1088868307301032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  20 in total

1.  Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.

Authors:  Jan Lorenz; Heiko Rauhut; Frank Schweitzer; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game.

Authors:  Stefano Balietti; Robert L Goldstone; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A dynamic framework on travel mode choice focusing on utilitarian walking based on the integration of current knowledge.

Authors:  Yong Yang
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2016-03-17

5.  Modeling spatial segregation and travel cost influences on utilitarian walking: Towards policy intervention.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Amy H Auchincloss; Daniel A Rodriguez; Daniel G Brown; Rick Riolo; Ana V Diez-Roux
Journal:  Comput Environ Urban Syst       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  The Big Impact of Small Groups on College Drinking.

Authors:  B Fitzpatrick; J Martinez; E Polidan; E Angelis
Journal:  J Artif Soc Soc Simul       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Multiple social network influences can generate unexpected environmental outcomes.

Authors:  J Yletyinen; G L W Perry; P Stahlmann-Brown; R Pech; J M Tylianakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Opinion formation and the collective dynamics of risk perception.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differentiation without distancing. explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence.

Authors:  Michael Mäs; Andreas Flache
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Juliane E Kämmer; Pantelis P Analytis; Hansjörg Neth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.