Literature DB >> 18453433

Whole-stream response to nitrate loading in three streams draining agricultural landscapes.

John H Duff1, Anthony J Tesoriero, William B Richardson, Eric A Strauss, Mark D Munn.   

Abstract

Physical, chemical, hydrologic, and biologic factors affecting nitrate (NO3(-)) removal were evaluated in three agricultural streams draining orchard/dairy and row crop settings. Using 3-d "snapshots" during biotically active periods, we estimated reach-level NO3(-) sources, NO3(-) mass balance, in-stream processing (nitrification, denitrification, and NO3(-) uptake), and NO3(-) retention potential associated with surface water transport and ground water discharge. Ground water contributed 5 to 11% to stream discharge along the study reaches and 8 to 42% of gross NO3(-) input. Streambed processes potentially reduced 45 to 75% of ground water NO3(-) before discharge to surface water. In all streams, transient storage was of little importance for surface water NO3(-) retention. Estimated nitrification (1.6-4.4 mg N m(-2) h(-1)) and unamended denitrification rates (2.0-16.3 mg N m(-2) h(-1)) in sediment slurries were high relative to pristine streams. Denitrification of NO3(-) was largely independent of nitrification because both stream and ground water were sources of NO3(-). Unamended denitrification rates extrapolated to the reach-scale accounted for <5% of NO3(-) exported from the reaches minimally reducing downstream loads. Nitrate retention as a percentage of gross NO3(-) inputs was >30% in an organic-poor, autotrophic stream with the lowest denitrification potentials and highest benthic chlorophyll a, photosynthesis/respiration ratio, pH, dissolved oxygen, and diurnal NO3(-) variation. Biotic processing potentially removed 75% of ground water NO3(-) at this site, suggesting an important role for photosynthetic assimilation of ground water NO3(-) relative to subsurface denitrification as water passed directly through benthic diatom beds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453433     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  3 in total

1.  The relative influence of nutrients and habitat on stream metabolism in agricultural streams.

Authors:  Jill D Frankforter; Holly S Weyers; Jerad D Bales; Patrick W Moran; Daniel L Calhoun
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Nitrate uptake in an agricultural stream estimated from high-frequency, in-situ sensors.

Authors:  Christopher S Jones; Sea-Won Kim; Thomas F Wilton; Keith E Schilling; Caroline A Davis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The influence of nutrients and physical habitat in regulating algal biomass in agricultural streams.

Authors:  Mark Munn; Jeffrey Frey; Anthony Tesoriero
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.266

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.