Literature DB >> 18453275

Biofilms on central venous catheters: is eradication possible?

R M Donlan1.   

Abstract

Biofilms on indwelling medical devices such as central venous catheters result in significant morbidity and mortality and have a substantial impact on healthcare delivery. Because routine systemic treatment of patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infections is often ineffective, due to the tolerance of biofilm organisms on these devices, other strategies such as the antimicrobial lock treatment (ALT) have been used. This approach involves the instillation of high concentrations of the antimicrobial agent directly into the biofilm-containing catheter for exposure (i.e., dwell) times sufficient to eradicate the biofilm. Results from human studies, animal studies, and laboratory studies using in vitro model systems have suggested that eradication of a biofilm is possible, depending on the organisms in the biofilm, biofilm age, the antimicrobial agent used, and the dwell/ duration of the treatment. The most effective antimicrobial agents are those (1) that are less affected by the extracellular polymeric substance matrix of the biofilm, (2) that have a more rapid bactericidal effect, or (3) for which the mechanism of action is not dependent upon the growth rates of the organisms. Combining agents may also provide synergy. Fungal biofilms have proven to be much more difficult to treat using the ALT, though newer fungicidal drugs such as the echinocandins hold promise in this regard. However, a serious drawback with the ALT is the potential for the development of resistance. Newer treatments, incorporating agents not classified as antibiotics, appear to effectively eradicate biofilms in in vitro models and should be evaluated in animal and patient studies. Promising technologies that incorporate novel approaches such as ultrasound, bacteriophage, quorum-sensing inhibitors, or enzymes may also provide useful approaches in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18453275     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0070-217X            Impact factor:   4.291


  18 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms.

Authors:  Daniel López; Hera Vlamakis; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Inhibition and Dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms by Combination Treatment with Escapin Intermediate Products and Hydrogen Peroxide.

Authors:  Ariel J Santiago; Marwa N A Ahmed; Shu-Lin Wang; Krishna Damera; Binghe Wang; Phang C Tai; Eric S Gilbert; Charles D Derby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Combined use of bacteriophage K and a novel bacteriophage to reduce Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

Authors:  D R Alves; A Gaudion; J E Bean; P Perez Esteban; T C Arnot; D R Harper; W Kot; L H Hansen; M C Enright; A Tobias A Jenkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Principles of source control in the early management of sepsis.

Authors:  John C Marshall
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  In vitro evaluation of antibiotic lock technique for the treatment of Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis biofilms.

Authors:  Kwan Soo Ko; Ji-Young Lee; Jae-Hoon Song; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Impact of sarA on daptomycin susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vivo.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Weiss; Agnieszka Zielinska; Karen E Beenken; Horace J Spencer; Sonja J Daily; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antibacterial Action of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Chitosan Oligosaccharides against Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions.

Authors:  Katelyn P Reighard; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Activity of imipenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Akhil K Seth; Johnathan J Abercrombie; Thomas A Mustoe; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms involved in Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation.

Authors:  Benjamin Mielich-Süss; Daniel Lopez
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Hacking into bacterial biofilms: a new therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Christophe Bordi; Sophie de Bentzmann
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.