Literature DB >> 18452877

Familial disease with a risk of sudden death: a longitudinal study of the psychological consequences of predictive testing for long QT syndrome.

Karin S W H Hendriks1, Margriet M W B Hendriks, Erwin Birnie, Frans J M Grosfeld, Arthur A M Wilde, Jan van den Bout, Ellen M A Smets, J Peter van Tintelen, Herman F J ten Kroode, Irene M van Langen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1996, in the Netherlands, cardiac and molecular screening has been performed in families with the long QT syndrome, a potentially life-threatening but treatable cardiac arrhythmia syndrome. The psychological consequences of predictive cardiac and molecular screening in these families are relatively unknown.
OBJECTIVE: A psychological study was initiated to investigate the extent and course of distress caused by this new form of predictive genetic testing.
METHODS: We carried out a prospective study to assess the extent and course of disease-related anxiety and depression, caused by predictive genetic testing, in applicants and their partners from the time of first consultation until 18 months after the disclosure of the result of genetic testing.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven applicants and 57 partners were investigated for measures of distress in 3 assessments. Those individuals who received an uncertain electrocardiogram result seemed especially vulnerable for distress, at least in the short term. The distress levels in the whole group of applicants were largely restored within 18 months. However, the disease-related anxiety scores in carriers remained relatively increased at long term. As compared with partners of noncarriers, partners of mutation carriers had higher levels of disease-related anxiety at all 3 assessments.
CONCLUSION: Predictive testing for long QT syndrome consisting of cardiologic testing followed by molecular testing leads to distress, especially in carriers with an uncertain electrocardiogram and their partners at first visit. These distress levels return to normal at long term. However, for carriers with an uncertain electrocardiogram, the incidence of clinically relevant distress was high, most probably also caused by the consequences of having the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18452877     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  20 in total

1.  Founder mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  I Christiaans; E A Nannenberg; D Dooijes; R J E Jongbloed; M Michels; P G Postema; D Majoor-Krakauer; A van den Wijngaard; M M A M Mannens; J P van Tintelen; I M van Langen; A A M Wilde
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Reproductive Decision Making and Genetic Predisposition to Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Dorit Barlevy; David Wasserman; Marina Stolerman; Kathleen E Erskine; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  Psychosocial Implications of Living with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Adulthood.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Catherine Spinks; Andrew Davis; Christian Turner; John Atherton; Julie McGaughran; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  [Genetic testing in hereditary arrythmia syndromes today and in the future].

Authors:  Britt-Maria Beckmann; Stefan Kääb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-09-20

5.  LQTS parents' reflections about genetic risk knowledge and their need to know or not to know their children's carrier status.

Authors:  Margrete Mangset; Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Genetic counseling and testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an adult perspective.

Authors:  Cécile Skrzynia; Erin M Demo; Samantha M Baxter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Is Symptomatic Long QT Syndrome Associated with Depression in Women and Men?

Authors:  Karolina Wesołowska; Marko Elovainio; Mikael Koponen; Annukka M Tuiskula; Mirka Hintsanen; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Ilmari Määttänen; Heikki Swan; Taina Hintsa
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Minding the Genes: a Multidisciplinary Approach towards Genetic Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Ashley Rhodes; Lindsey Rosman; John Cahill; Jodie Ingles; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Cynthia A James; Samuel F Sears
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Prospective Decision Analysis Study of Clinical Genomic Testing in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Impact on Outcomes and Patient Perceptions.

Authors:  Daniel G Stover; Raquel E Reinbolt; Elizabeth J Adams; Sarah Asad; Katlyn Tolliver; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Cynthia D Timmers; Susan Gillespie; James L Chen; Siraj Mahamed Ali; Katharine A Collier; Mathew A Cherian; Anne M Noonan; Sagar Sardesai; Jeffrey VanDeusen; Robert Wesolowski; Nicole Williams; Clara N Lee; Charles L Shapiro; Erin R Macrae; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Maryam B Lustberg
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-11-18

10.  Health status in patients at risk of inherited arrhythmias and sudden unexpected death compared to the general population.

Authors:  Anniken Hamang; Geir Egil Eide; Karin Nordin; Berit Rokne; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Nina Øyen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.