OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether use of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) services decreased after the passage of the 1997 Balanced Budget Act (BBA). DESIGN: Data from the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) were merged with Medicare claims data. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of data from 1995 (n=7978), 1999 (n=7863), and 2001 (n=7973). All analyses used MCBS sampling weights to provide estimates that can be generalized to the Medicare population with 5 common conditions. SETTINGS: Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), home health agencies, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and outpatient rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the MCBS survey in each of the study years and had 1 or more of the following conditions: acute stroke, acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis or degenerative joint disease, or mobility problems. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of persons meeting our inclusion criteria who received PT or OT in each setting, and total units of PT and OT received in each setting. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression revealed no statistically significant differences in the proportion of people who met our inclusion criteria who used PT or OT from home health agencies across the 3 time points. For SNFs, an increase in the odds of receiving PT was statistically significant from 1995 to 1999 (odds ratio [OR]=1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.69) and 1995 to 2001 (OR=1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.05). For IRF and outpatient settings, a significant increase was observed between 1995 and 2001 (OR=1.71, OR=1.27, respectively). For OT, a statistically significant increase was observed for IRF and outpatient rehabilitation settings from 1995 to 2001. For SNF, the increase was statistically significant from 1995 to 1999 and 1995 to 2001. Mean total PT and OT units received also increased across all settings from 1995 to 2001 except for IRFs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite BBA mandates restricting postacute care expenditures, this nationally representative study showed no decreases in the percentage of Medicare beneficiaries with 5 common diagnoses receiving PT and/or OT across all settings and no decreases in units of PT and/or OT services received between 1995 and 2001 except for those in IRFs. This study suggests that the delivery of PT and OT services did not decline among persons with conditions for which rehabilitation services are often clinically indicated.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether use of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) services decreased after the passage of the 1997 Balanced Budget Act (BBA). DESIGN: Data from the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) were merged with Medicare claims data. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of data from 1995 (n=7978), 1999 (n=7863), and 2001 (n=7973). All analyses used MCBS sampling weights to provide estimates that can be generalized to the Medicare population with 5 common conditions. SETTINGS: Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), home health agencies, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and outpatient rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the MCBS survey in each of the study years and had 1 or more of the following conditions: acute stroke, acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis or degenerative joint disease, or mobility problems. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of persons meeting our inclusion criteria who received PT or OT in each setting, and total units of PT and OT received in each setting. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression revealed no statistically significant differences in the proportion of people who met our inclusion criteria who used PT or OT from home health agencies across the 3 time points. For SNFs, an increase in the odds of receiving PT was statistically significant from 1995 to 1999 (odds ratio [OR]=1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.69) and 1995 to 2001 (OR=1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.05). For IRF and outpatient settings, a significant increase was observed between 1995 and 2001 (OR=1.71, OR=1.27, respectively). For OT, a statistically significant increase was observed for IRF and outpatient rehabilitation settings from 1995 to 2001. For SNF, the increase was statistically significant from 1995 to 1999 and 1995 to 2001. Mean total PT and OT units received also increased across all settings from 1995 to 2001 except for IRFs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite BBA mandates restricting postacute care expenditures, this nationally representative study showed no decreases in the percentage of Medicare beneficiaries with 5 common diagnoses receiving PT and/or OT across all settings and no decreases in units of PT and/or OT services received between 1995 and 2001 except for those in IRFs. This study suggests that the delivery of PT and OT services did not decline among persons with conditions for which rehabilitation services are often clinically indicated.
Authors: Nancy K Latham; Bette Ann Harris; Jonathan F Bean; Timothy Heeren; Christine Goodyear; Stacey Zawacki; Diane M Heislein; Jabed Mustafa; Poonam Pardasaney; Marie Giorgetti; Nicole Holt; Lori Goehring; Alan M Jette Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; Julia McGee; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Chelsea Herbert; Rosevine Azap; Alizeh Abbas; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603