Literature DB >> 18452520

High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism.

L W Tick1, M Nijkeuter, M H H Kramer, M M C Hovens, H R Büller, F W G Leebeek, M V Huisman.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine the utility of high quantitative D-dimer levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Methods. D-dimer testing was performed in consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. We included patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with a high risk for venous thromboembolism, i.e. hospitalized patients, patients older than 80 years, with malignancy or previous surgery. Presence of pulmonary embolism was based on a diagnostic management strategy using a clinical decision rule (CDR), D-dimer testing and computed tomography. Results. A total of 1515 patients were included with an overall pulmonary embolism prevalence of 21%. The pulmonary embolism prevalence was strongly associated with the height of the D-dimer level, and increased fourfold with D-dimer levels greater than 4000 ng mL(-1) compared to levels between 500 and 1000 ng mL(-1). Patients with D-dimer levels higher than 2000 ng mL(-1) and an unlikely CDR had a pulmonary embolism prevalence of 36%. This prevalence is comparable to the pulmonary embolism likely CDR group. When D-dimer levels were above 4000 ng mL(-1), the observed pulmonary embolism prevalence was very high, independent of CDR score. Conclusion. Strongly elevated D-dimer levels substantially increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism. Whether this should translate into more intensive diagnostic and therapeutic measures in patients with high D-dimer levels irrespective of CDR remains to be studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18452520     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  8 in total

1.  EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT.

Authors:  M Bajc; J B Neilly; M Miniati; C Schuemichen; M Meignan; B Jonson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The diagnostic performance of APC-PCI complex determination compared to D-dimer in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Johan L Elf; Karin Strandberg; Peter J Svensson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Joint Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism - 2022.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker; Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire; Simone Nascimento Dos Santos; Monica Luiza de Alcantara; Mohamed Hassan Saleh; Armando Luis Cantisano; José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro; Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto; Salomon Israel do Amaral; Orlando Carlos Gloria Veloso; Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco; Fanilda Souto Barros; Márcio Vinícius Lins de Barros; Adriano José de Souza; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Robson Barbosa de Miranda; Domingos de Moraes; Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro; Alexandre Dias Mançano; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Cristina Sebastião Matushita; Rafael Willain Lopes; Artur Martins Novaes Coutinho; Diego Bromfman Pianta; Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos; Bruno de Lima Naves; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Ultrasound Evaluation for Extremity Deep Vein Thrombus in COVID-19-Positive Patients: Exam Positivity Rate and Association With D-Dimer Level.

Authors:  Hernan R Bello; Marta E Heilbrun; Omar N Kallas; Dean W Thongkham; Cindy D Powell; Courtney C Moreno
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  [Prevalence and severity of pulmonary embolism are dependent on clinical and paraclinical parameters : Analysis of 1,943 consecutive patients with CT pulmonary angiography].

Authors:  P Kocea; K Mischke; H-P Volk; U Eberle; J R Ortlepp
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  D-dimer value in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism-may it exclude only?

Authors:  Magdalena Sikora-Skrabaka; Damian Skrabaka; Paolo Ruggeri; Gaetano Caramori; Szymon Skoczyński; Adam Barczyk
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  Swaroopa Pulivarthi; Murali Krishna Gurram
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-10

Review 8.  Proteoforms and their expanding role in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Lauren M Forgrave; Meng Wang; David Yang; Mari L DeMarco
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.