Literature DB >> 18452460

Neuroendocrine differentiation in stage D2 prostate cancers.

Naoto Kamiya1, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Koji Kawamura, Takashi Imamoto, Yukio Naya, Naobumi Tochigi, Yukio Kakuta, Kunio Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Ishikura, Tomohiko Ichikawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chromogranin A (CgA) and neuro-specific enolase (NSE) are gaining acceptance as markers of several types of neuroendocrine tumors and the concentration of CgA and NSE have been reported to be elevated in relation to neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to examine the correlation between the immunohistochemical (IHC) findings and serum value for CgA and NSE in untreated stage D(2) prostate cancer patients.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was carried out using antibodies against CgA and NSE in 58 patients and, pretreatment serum CgA and NSE levels were measured by monoclonal immunoradiometric assay in 18 patients with stage D(2) prostate cancer treated by androgen ablation. We examined the relationship of the pretreatment serum level to IHC findings for CgA and NSE in prostate cancer patients to clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis. Also, we evaluated the correlation of IHC findings to serum levels for CgA and NSE.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between CgA positivity and serum CgA level (P = 0.0421). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between NSE positivity and serum NSE level (P > 0.05). We divided stage D(2) patients into three groups according to IHC positivity of CgA and NSE. The cause-specific survival was significantly poorer in patients with strongly positive (++) patients for independent CgA and combined CgA with NSE (P = 0.0379). Multivariate analysis of cause-specific survivals in patients with stage D(2) prostate cancer demonstrated that strong IHC stain was considered as independent variable associated with greater risk of death (P = 0.0142).
CONCLUSION: Neuroendocrine differentiation in stage D(2) prostate cancer has attracted considerable attention as a potentially findings prognosis. Thus, CgA had a stronger relationship between serum levels and IHC positivity in contrast to NSE, suggesting clinical usefulness as a tumor marker in predicting the extent of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18452460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  11 in total

1.  Ionizing radiation induces neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells in vitro, in vivo and in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Xuehong Deng; Bennett D Elzey; Jean M Poulson; Wallace B Morrison; Song-Chu Ko; Noah M Hahn; Timothy L Ratliff; Chang-Deng Hu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Notch signaling modulates hypoxia-induced neuroendocrine differentiation of human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Giovanna Danza; Claudia Di Serio; Fabiana Rosati; Giuseppe Lonetto; Niccolò Sturli; Doreen Kacer; Antonio Pennella; Giuseppina Ventimiglia; Riccardo Barucci; Annamaria Piscazzi; Igor Prudovsky; Matteo Landriscina; Niccolò Marchionni; Francesca Tarantini
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Does valproic acid induce neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer?

Authors:  Abhinav Sidana; Muwen Wang; Wasim H Chowdhury; Antoun Toubaji; Shabana Shabbeer; George Netto; Michael Carducci; Shawn E Lupold; Ronald Rodriguez
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-25

4.  Serotonin used as prognostic marker of urological tumors.

Authors:  Nina Jungwirth; Lothar Haeberle; Karl Michael Schrott; Bernd Wullich; Frens Steffen Krause
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The prognostic significance of loss of the androgen receptor and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate biopsy specimens among castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Akira Komiya; Kenji Yasuda; Akihiko Watanabe; Yasuyoshi Fujiuchi; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Hideki Fuse
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-14

6.  Cell-to-cell signaling influences the fate of prostate cancer stem cells and their potential to generate more aggressive tumors.

Authors:  Luisa Salvatori; Francesca Caporuscio; Alessandra Verdina; Giuseppe Starace; Stefania Crispi; Maria Rita Nicotra; Andrea Russo; Raffaele Adolfo Calogero; Emanuela Morgante; Pier Giorgio Natali; Matteo Antonio Russo; Elisa Petrangeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The role of treatment modality on the utility of predictive tissue biomarkers in clinical prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Naveen Kachroo; Vincent J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Correlation of three immunohistochemically detected markers of neuroendocrine differentiation with clinical predictors of disease progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Farhat Abbas; Nuzhat Faruqui; Mohammad Israr; Shahid Pervez
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma biopsies and its correlation to histological grading.

Authors:  Mădălina Marcu; E Radu; Maria Sajin
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 10.  Prognostic role of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer, putting together the pieces of the puzzle.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Francesca Vignani; Lucianna Russo; Valentina Bertaglia; Mattia Tullio; Marcello Tucci; Massimiliano Poggio; Luigi Dogliotti
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2010-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.