Literature DB >> 18452055

Socioeconomic differences in weight retention, weight-related attitudes and practices in postpartum women.

Vanessa A Shrewsbury1, Kathryn A Robb, Chris Power, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in postpartum weight retention in women living in the UK, and examine SES differences in weight-related attitudes and practices in the postpartum period.
METHODS: Women (n = 2745) who had full-term live births between July and December 1999 in four London hospitals were eligible to participate in this self-report postal questionnaire study. The questionnaire included items on socio-demographic characteristics, pre-pregnancy weight, postpartum height and weight, pregnancy weight gain and duration, and postpartum weight-related attitudes (body image and weight beliefs) and practices (weight control and weight monitoring). Education was used as the indicator of SES.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 954 women (35%) on average eight months postpartum. Median postpartum weight retention was 2.7 kg and was significantly higher in the medium and lower SES women (3.2 kg) than higher SES women (1.8 kg) despite no difference in pregnancy weight gain. A greater proportion of higher SES women believed they would return to their pre-pregnant weight, and they engaged in more frequent weight monitoring. There were no SES differences in body dissatisfaction or the proportion of women trying to lose weight postpartum.
CONCLUSION: In the postpartum period, women of higher SES retained less weight than women of lower SES. There were also differences in weight-related attitudes and frequency of weight monitoring across SES groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18452055     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0342-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  31 in total

1.  Eating attitudes and behaviors in pregnancy and postpartum: global stability versus specific transitions.

Authors:  C W Baker; A S Carter; L R Cohen; K D Brownell
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

2.  A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss.

Authors:  M L Klem; R R Wing; M T McGuire; H M Seagle; J O Hill
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Socioeconomic status and weight control practices in British adults.

Authors:  J Wardle; J Griffith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Educational inequalities in the metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease among middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  Karri Silventoinen; James Pankow; Pekka Jousilahti; Gang Hu; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Self-weighing in weight gain prevention and weight loss trials.

Authors:  Jennifer A Linde; Robert W Jeffery; Simone A French; Nicolaas P Pronk; Raymond G Boyle
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-12

6.  The estimation of body mass index and physical attractiveness is dependent on the observer's own body mass index.

Authors:  M J Tovée; J L Emery; E M Cohen-Tovée
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Impact of perinatal weight change on long-term obesity and obesity-related illnesses.

Authors:  Brenda L Rooney; Charles W Schauberger; Michelle A Mathiason
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Evaluating innovations in maternity care: methodological approaches to a baseline postal survey.

Authors:  Jane Yelland; Stephanie Brown; Ann Krastev
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Do the changes in energy balance that occur during pregnancy predispose parous women to obesity?

Authors:  H E Harris; G T Ellison
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.800

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Sobal; A J Stunkard
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between breastfeeding and postpartum weight change--a systematic review and critical evaluation.

Authors:  C E Neville; M C McKinley; V A Holmes; D Spence; J V Woodside
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Maternal stress predicts postpartum weight retention.

Authors:  Kara Whitaker; Deborah Young-Hyman; Marlo Vernon; Sara Wilcox
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-11

3.  Self-efficacy scale for weight loss among multi-ethnic women of lower income: a psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Lara Latimer; Lorraine O Walker; Sunghun Kim; Keryn E Pasch; Bobbie Sue Sterling
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Weight Change Pattern Among Breastfeeding Mothers: One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sule Aktac; Perran Boran
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Weight during the postpartum period: what can health care workers do?

Authors:  Kathleen Biesmans; Erik Franck; Christine Ceulemans; Yves Jacquemyn; Peter Van Bogaert
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-08

6.  Sociodemographic, perinatal, behavioral, and psychosocial predictors of weight retention at 3 and 12 months postpartum.

Authors:  Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring; Kathryn Carrier; Kelly R Evenson; Nancy Dole; Andrea Deierlein
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 5.002

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.