Literature DB >> 18452049

Impact of gastro-esophageal reflux on mucin mRNA expression in the esophageal mucosa.

Aafke H C van Roon1, George C Mayne, Bas P L Wijnhoven, David I Watson, Mary P Leong, Gabriëlle E Neijman, Michael Z Michael, Andrew R McKay, David Astill, Damian J Hussey.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Changes in the expression of mucin genes in the esophageal mucosa associated with uncomplicated gastro-esophageal reflux disease have not been evaluated even though such changes could be associated with reflux-induced mucosal damage. We therefore sought to identify reflux-induced changes in mucin gene expression using a cell line and biopsies from the esophageal mucosa in patients with and without reflux.
METHODS: MUC-1, MUC-3, MUC-4, and MUC-5AC gene expressions were investigated in the HET-1A cell line following exposure to acid (pH 4) and/or bile (120 muM of a bile salt milieu), and in esophageal mucosal biopsies from controls, subjects with non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux, and subjects with reflux associated with ulcerative esophagitis (erosive). The mucosal biopsies were also evaluated for IL-6 mRNA expression (inflammatory marker) and CK-14 mRNA expression (mucosal basal cell layer marker). Gene expression was determined using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis.
RESULTS: In the cell line studies, there were differences in mRNA levels for all of the evaluated mucins following treatment with either acid or the acid and bile combination. In the studies which evaluated tissue specimens, IL-6 and CK-14 mRNA levels increased according to degree of reflux pathology. The expression of MUC-1 and MUC-4 in mucosa from patients with erosive reflux was lower than in subjects without reflux and in patients with non-erosive reflux, whereas the expression of MUC-3 and MUC-5AC was increased (although these differences did not reach significance at p < 0.05). When mRNA expression data for tissue samples from all groups were combined, significant correlations were identified between IL-6 vs. CK-14 and IL-6 vs. MUC-3, MUC-3 vs. CK-14 and MUC-3 vs. MUC-5AC, and for MUC-1 vs. MUC-5AC. The correlation between IL-6 and CK-14 was also significant within the control and non-erosive reflux groups. The correlation between IL-6 and MUC-3 was significant within the control and erosive reflux groups, and the correlation between MUC-1 and MUC-5AC was significant within the erosive reflux group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the profile of mucin expression in the esophageal mucosa is influenced by the pH and composition of the gastro-esophageal reflux. Further work should explore the response of these genes to acid and bile reflux, and their role in the etiology of mucosal damage in gastro-esophageal reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18452049     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0522-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

1.  Developmental mucin gene expression in the gastroduodenal tract and accessory digestive glands. II. Duodenum and liver, gallbladder, and pancreas.

Authors:  M P Buisine; L Devisme; P Degand; M C Dieu; B Gosselin; M C Copin; J P Aubert; N Porchet
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Mucin gene expression and cell differentiation in human normal, premalignant and malignant esophagus.

Authors:  P Guillem; V Billeret; M P Buisine; J F Flejou; M Lecomte-Houcke; P Degand; J P Aubert; J P Triboulet; N Porchet
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data.

Authors:  Perikles Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The impact of reflux composition on mucosal injury and esophageal function.

Authors:  Daniel S Oh; Jeffrey A Hagen; Martin Fein; Cedric G Bremner; Christy M Dunst; Steven R Demeester; John Lipham; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations.

Authors:  L D Hill; R A Kozarek; S J Kraemer; R W Aye; C D Mercer; D E Low; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Immunoreactivity of cytokeratins (CK7, CK20) and mucin peptide core antigens (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC) in adenocarcinomas, normal and metaplastic tissues of the distal oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction and proximal stomach.

Authors:  U Flucke; E Steinborn; V Dries; S P Mönig; P M Schneider; J Thiele; A H Hölscher; H P Dienes; S E Baldus
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  Nonerosive reflux disease.

Authors:  J D Long; R C Orlando
Journal:  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol       Date:  2007-06

8.  Human esophageal secretion: mucosal response to luminal acid and pepsin.

Authors:  Z Namiot; J Sarosiek; R M Rourk; D P Hetzel; R W McCallum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Cell signaling through membrane mucins.

Authors:  Kermit L Carraway; Victoria P Ramsauer; Bushra Haq; Coralie A Carothers Carraway
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Christine P J Caygill; Anthony Watson; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  8 in total

1.  The role of mucin in GERD and its complications.

Authors:  Yaron Niv; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Pancreatoduodenectomy associated with colonic resections: indications, pitfalls, and outcomes.

Authors:  Tommaso Giuliani; Anthony Di Gioia; Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-13

3.  HCl-induced and ATP-dependent upregulation of TRPV1 receptor expression and cytokine production by human esophageal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Jie Ma; Annamaria Altomare; Michele Guarino; Michele Cicala; Florian Rieder; Claudio Fiocchi; Dan Li; Weibiao Cao; Jose Behar; Piero Biancani; Karen M Harnett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux on microRNA expression, location and function.

Authors:  Cameron M Smith; Michael Z Michael; David I Watson; Grace Tan; David St J Astill; Richard Hummel; Damian J Hussey
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Accuracy of identification of tissue types in endoscopic esophageal mucosal biopsies used for molecular biology studies.

Authors:  Plauto Beck; George C Mayne; David Astill; Tanya Irvine; David I Watson; Willem A Dijckmeester; Bas Pl Wijnhoven; Damian J Hussey
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-09

Review 6.  Cell culture models for studying the development of Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Bus; P D Siersema; J W P M van Baal
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 7.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux: diagnosis, treatment, and latest research.

Authors:  Andrea Maria Campagnolo; Jaqueline Priston; Rebecca Heidrich Thoen; Tatiana Medeiros; Aída Regina Assunção
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-05

Review 8.  Pepsin and Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Carcinomas.

Authors:  Cheng-Yi Yin; Sha-Sha Zhang; Jiang-Tao Zhong; Shui-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.