PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity of imatinib in treating advanced, life-threatening malignancies expressing one or more imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a phase II, open-label, single arm study. Patients > or = 15 years old with malignancies showing histologic or molecular evidence of expression/activation of imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases were enrolled. Patients were treated with 400 or 800 mg/d imatinib for hematologic malignancy and solid tumors, respectively. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to identify evidence of imatinib activity with tumor response as the primary end point. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients with 40 different malignancies were enrolled (78.5% solid tumors, 21.5% hematologic malignancies). Confirmed response occurred in 8.9% of solid tumor patients (4 complete, 9 partial) and 27.5% of hematologic malignancy patients (8 complete, 3 partial). Notable activity of imatinib was observed in only five tumor types (aggressive fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, hypereosinophilic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorders, and systemic mastocytosis). A total of 106 tumors were screened for activating mutations: five KIT mutations and no platelet-derived growth factor receptor mutations were found. One patient with systemic mastocytosis and a partial response to therapy had a novel imatinib-sensitive KIT mutation (D816T). There was no clear relationship between expression or activation of wild-type imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases and clinical response. CONCLUSION: Clinical benefit was largely confined to diseases with known genomic mechanisms of activation of imatinib target kinases. Our results indicate an important role for molecular characterization of tumors to identify patients likely to benefit from imatinib treatment.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity of imatinib in treating advanced, life-threatening malignancies expressing one or more imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a phase II, open-label, single arm study. Patients > or = 15 years old with malignancies showing histologic or molecular evidence of expression/activation of imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases were enrolled. Patients were treated with 400 or 800 mg/d imatinib for hematologic malignancy and solid tumors, respectively. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to identify evidence of imatinib activity with tumor response as the primary end point. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients with 40 different malignancies were enrolled (78.5% solid tumors, 21.5% hematologic malignancies). Confirmed response occurred in 8.9% of solid tumorpatients (4 complete, 9 partial) and 27.5% of hematologic malignancypatients (8 complete, 3 partial). Notable activity of imatinib was observed in only five tumor types (aggressive fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, hypereosinophilic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorders, and systemic mastocytosis). A total of 106 tumors were screened for activating mutations: five KIT mutations and no platelet-derived growth factor receptor mutations were found. One patient with systemic mastocytosis and a partial response to therapy had a novel imatinib-sensitive KIT mutation (D816T). There was no clear relationship between expression or activation of wild-type imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases and clinical response. CONCLUSION: Clinical benefit was largely confined to diseases with known genomic mechanisms of activation of imatinib target kinases. Our results indicate an important role for molecular characterization of tumors to identify patients likely to benefit from imatinib treatment.
Authors: Justin M M Cates; Jennifer O Black; Doha M Itani; John H Fasig; Vicki L Keedy; Kenneth R Hande; Brent W Whited; Kelly C Homlar; Jennifer L Halpern; Ginger E Holt; Herbert S Schwartz; Cheryl M Coffin Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Michael Medinger; Manuela Kleinschmidt; Klaus Mross; Barbara Wehmeyer; Clemens Unger; Hans-Eckart Schaefer; Renate Weber; Marc Azemar Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Mrinal M Gounder; Robert A Lefkowitz; Mary Louise Keohan; David R D'Adamo; Meera Hameed; Cristina R Antonescu; Samuel Singer; Katherine Stout; Linda Ahn; Robert G Maki Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Grant Eilers; Jeffrey T Czaplinski; Mark Mayeda; Nacef Bahri; Derrick Tao; Meijun Zhu; Jason L Hornick; Neal I Lindeman; Ewa Sicinska; Andrew J Wagner; Jonathan A Fletcher; Adrian Mariño-Enriquez Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Wei-Lien Wang; Jonathan Trent; Dan Yang; Su Chen; John Galbincea; Kevin B Kim; Scott Woodman; Michael Davies; Jose A Plaza; J W Nash; Victor G Prieto; Alexander J Lazar; Doina Ivan Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 7.842