Literature DB >> 18450323

Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

Thomas J Webb, Bob O'Hara, Robert P Freckleton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18450323     DOI： 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN： 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Authorship Trends Over the Past 30-Years in the Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

Authors:  Izath Nizeet Aguilar; Venkateswaran Ganesh; Rachel Mannfeld; Riley Gorden; Jennifer M Hatch; Shatoria Lunsford; Elizabeth C Whipple; Randall T Loder; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  A systematic review of peer review for scientific manuscripts.

Authors:  Bradley P Larson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 5.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 6.  Emerging trends in peer review-a survey.

Authors:  Richard Walker; Pascal Rocha da Silva
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review.

Authors:  Andrew Tomkins; Min Zhang; William D Heavlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017.

Authors:  Alana M Flexman; Arun Parmar; Gianni R Lorello
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?

Authors:  Marco Seeber; Alberto Bacchelli
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara McGillivray; Elisa De Ranieri
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2018-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.