OBJECTIVE: To determine whether more frequent engagement in larger social networks, and more emotional support protect against cognitive and functional decline with aging. METHODS: We examined the influence of social networks on cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) over a median interval of 10.9 years. Data were from the Baltimore follow-up of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study, a community-based sample of adults in eastern Baltimore. Eight hundred and seventy-four participants completed cognitive testing at both the third and fourth study waves (1993-1996 and 2003-2004) on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a delayed word recall task. Functional status at both waves was self-reported on the Lawton-Brody IADL scale. Social network characteristics, assessed at the third study wave, included network size, frequency of contact, and emotional support. RESULTS: In cross-sectional analyses at wave 3, larger networks were associated with higher MMSE and better delayed recall scores. This association persisted after adjustment for covariates. More emotional support was associated with better functional status, before and after adjustment. By contrast, social networks were not longitudinally associated with cognitive change, with two counter-intuitive exceptions: more frequent contact and more emotional support were associated with worse delayed recall and IADL scores after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a longitudinal association between social networks and cognition or IADLs, although a clear cross-sectional association exists. Together, these findings suggest the emergence of social isolation in individuals declining in cognition and functioning, rather than a protective effect of social networks.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether more frequent engagement in larger social networks, and more emotional support protect against cognitive and functional decline with aging. METHODS: We examined the influence of social networks on cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) over a median interval of 10.9 years. Data were from the Baltimore follow-up of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study, a community-based sample of adults in eastern Baltimore. Eight hundred and seventy-four participants completed cognitive testing at both the third and fourth study waves (1993-1996 and 2003-2004) on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a delayed word recall task. Functional status at both waves was self-reported on the Lawton-Brody IADL scale. Social network characteristics, assessed at the third study wave, included network size, frequency of contact, and emotional support. RESULTS: In cross-sectional analyses at wave 3, larger networks were associated with higher MMSE and better delayed recall scores. This association persisted after adjustment for covariates. More emotional support was associated with better functional status, before and after adjustment. By contrast, social networks were not longitudinally associated with cognitive change, with two counter-intuitive exceptions: more frequent contact and more emotional support were associated with worse delayed recall and IADL scores after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a longitudinal association between social networks and cognition or IADLs, although a clear cross-sectional association exists. Together, these findings suggest the emergence of social isolation in individuals declining in cognition and functioning, rather than a protective effect of social networks.
Authors: Joe Verghese; Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Charles B Hall; Carol A Derby; Gail Kuslansky; Anne F Ambrose; Martin Sliwinski; Herman Buschke Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dana A Glei; David A Landau; Noreen Goldman; Yi-Li Chuang; Germán Rodríguez; Maxine Weinstein Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: J Cornoni-Huntley; A M Ostfeld; J O Taylor; R B Wallace; D Blazer; L F Berkman; D A Evans; F J Kohout; J H Lemke; P A Scherr Journal: Aging (Milano) Date: 1993-02
Authors: C Fabrigoule; L Letenneur; J F Dartigues; M Zarrouk; D Commenges; P Barberger-Gateau Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cassandra L Brown; Annie Robitaille; Elizabeth M Zelinski; Roger A Dixon; Scott M Hofer; Andrea M Piccinin Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2016-12
Authors: M Kathryn Jedrziewski; Douglas C Ewbank; Haidong Wang; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Marko Elovainio; Andrew Sommerlad; Christian Hakulinen; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Marianna Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Paul Mick; Maksim Parfyonov; Walter Wittich; Natalie Phillips; Dawn Guthrie; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: David E Vance; Pariya L Fazeli; Joan E Dodson; Michelle Ackerman; Michele Talley; Susan J Appel Journal: J Neurosci Nurs Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 1.230
Authors: Willa D Brenowitz; Walter A Kukull; Shirley A A Beresford; Sarah E Monsell; Emily C Williams Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2014 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: David E Vance; Daniel C Marson; Kristen L Triebel; Karlene K Ball; Virginia G Wadley; Shameka L Cody Journal: J Neurosci Nurs Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.230