Literature DB >> 18449044

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials combined with response recording through compound muscle action potential as the sole modality of spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery.

Brian Hsu1, Andrew K Cree, Jim Lagopoulos, John L Cummine.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a prospective review of all spinal cord monitoring procedures in our unit from 1999 to 2004 in patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To report the sensitivity and specificity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (MEP) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) monitoring as the sole modality in spinal deformity correction surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Combined spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory-evoked potentials and MEP has been widely used. The use of CMAP as the only modality has not been widely used and its efficacy has not been fully elucidated.
METHODS: The intraoperative monitoring outcomes were compared with patient's postoperative clinical outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated and determined for our monitoring protocol.
RESULTS: Transcranial MEPs were measured in 144 patients in 172 procedures. In 2 patients (3 procedures), we were unable to record any CMAPs. There were 15 intraoperative monitoring changes. There were no new postoperative neurological deficits.
CONCLUSION: The monitoring criteria are sufficiently strict to achieve a sensitivity of 1.0 and a specificity of 0.97. Monitoring of CMAPs alone has been adequate to avoid clinical neurological deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18449044     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f5f09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  [Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Authors:  E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Intra-operative MEP monitoring can work well in the patients with neural axis abnormality.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Qianyu Zhuang; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian; Hong Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Yu Zhao; Shugang Li; Xisheng Weng; Guixing Qiu; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgical Treatment of the Occipitocervical Region.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Hai Nie; Zhuan Wang; Bao Yao; Jia-Hong Li; Ji Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Is It Real False Negative Finding in Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring during Corrective Surgery of Ankylosing Spondylitis? A Case Report.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Yoon-Ho Kwack; Eon-Seok Son
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-03-09

6.  Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Spinal Deformity Corrections-Safety, Efficacy, Limitations, and the Role of a Checklist.

Authors:  Shankar Acharya; Nagendra Palukuri; Pravin Gupta; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

7.  The prediction of intraoperative cervical cord function changes by different motor evoked potentials phenotypes in cervical myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Zhifu Ren; Jia Liu; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  The Use of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Anastasios Charalampidis; Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Darrel S Brodke; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.