Literature DB >> 18448850

Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: still good after all these years.

Najeeb A Ranginwala1, Linda S Hynan, Myron F Weiner, Charles L White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of newer neuropathological techniques on the power of National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-AD and Related Disorders Association criteria for Alzheimer disease (AD) to detect AD at later postmortem study.
DESIGN: We examined clinical and postmortem diagnoses of persons evaluated postmortem with thioflavin-S staining for plaques and tangles and immunohistochemical staining techniques for alpha synuclein, uhiquitin, and tau protein.
SETTING: Alzheimer Disease Center. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically evaluated persons for whom tissue diagnosis was available.
RESULTS: Of 313 evaluees, 166 met criteria for probable AD. An additional 59 subjects had clinical diagnoses that included AD, e.g., possible AD, Lewy body variant of AD, AD and Parkinsonism, and mixed AD and vascular dementia. Of the 166 probable AD cases, 147 of 166 (88.6%) met pathologic criteria for AD. When all five AD groups were combined, 194 of 225 subjects (86.2%) met pathologic criteria for AD. There were five cases diagnosed pathologically as tangle-only dementia, which was considered a variant of AD. A pathologic diagnosis of Lewy body variant of AD was made in 56 (17.9%) of cases, including 44 of 313 (14.1%) cases diagnosed as probable or possible AD. Pure dementia with Lewy bodies was seen in 13 (4.2%). There were 9 (2.9%) cases of mixed AD and vascular dementia, and 37 (11.4%) cases of frontotemporal dementia.
CONCLUSIONS: McKhann et al. criteria for probable and possible AD are valid for AD but do not exclude additional Lewy body pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448850     DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181629971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 1064-7481            Impact factor:   4.105


  27 in total

1.  Amyloid-β imaging with PET in Alzheimer's disease: is it feasible with current radiotracers and technologies?

Authors:  Mateen C Moghbel; Babak Saboury; Sandip Basu; Scott D Metzler; Drew A Torigian; Bengt Långström; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and rate of cognitive decline in very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  Barbara J Snider; Anne M Fagan; Catherine Roe; Aarti R Shah; Elizabeth A Grant; Chengjie Xiong; John C Morris; David M Holtzman
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-05

Review 3.  Mass spectrometry: A platform for biomarker discovery and validation for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Authors:  Eugene M Cilento; Lorrain Jin; Tessandra Stewart; Min Shi; Lifu Sheng; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Does past or present depression differentiate Lewy body from Alzheimer disease?

Authors:  Jed Falkowski; Linda S Hynan; Kyle B Womack; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Charles L White; Myron F Weiner
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.878

5.  Videoconference diagnosis and management of Choctaw Indian dementia patients.

Authors:  Myron F Weiner; Heidi C Rossetti; Kasia Harrah
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Luria's three-step test: what is it and what does it tell us?

Authors:  Myron F Weiner; Linda S Hynan; Heidi Rossetti; Jed Falkowski
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.878

Review 7.  Imaging biomarkers associated with cognitive decline: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan McConathy; Yvette I Sheline
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Prediction of Alzheimer's disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the ADNI cohort using patterns of cortical thinning.

Authors:  Simon F Eskildsen; Pierrick Coupé; Daniel García-Lorenzo; Vladimir Fonov; Jens C Pruessner; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Use of Standardized Uptake Value Ratios Decreases Interreader Variability of [18F] Florbetapir PET Brain Scan Interpretation.

Authors:  A P Nayate; J G Dubroff; J E Schmitt; I Nasrallah; R Kishore; D Mankoff; D A Pryma
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Brains with medial temporal lobe neurofibrillary tangles but no neuritic amyloid plaques are a diagnostic dilemma but may have pathogenetic aspects distinct from Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Peter T Nelson; Erin L Abner; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard J Kryscio; Gregory A Jicha; Karen Santacruz; Charles D Smith; Ela Patel; William R Markesbery
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.