Literature DB >> 18448599

Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm.

Cynthia S Puranik1, Linda J Lombardino, Lori J P Altmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to document the progression of the microstructural elements of written language in children at 4 grade levels. The secondary purpose was to ascertain whether the variables selected for examination could be classified into valid categories that reflect the multidimensional nature of writing.
METHOD: Written language samples were collected and transcribed from 120 children in Grades 3 through 6 using an expository text-retelling paradigm. Nine variables at various levels of language were analyzed.
RESULTS: Using a text-retelling paradigm, measures of productivity (e.g., total number of words and ideas) improved steadily with age, whereas measures of complexity (e.g., mean length of T-unit) did not. Results for measures of accuracy (e.g., spelling and writing conventions) were mixed, with some showing improvement across grades. Grade 3 students showed consistently poorer performance than students in Grades 4, 5, and 6. Grade 4 students showed poorer performance than students in Grades 5 and 6. Exploratory factor analysis suggests that writing can be represented by 3 factors: Productivity, Complexity, and Accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can use this multidimensional scheme for examining writing skills using text-retelling formats with children from Grades 3 through 6. This empirically based framework for measuring microstructural variables of writing provides clinicians with a 3-prong conceptual framework for determining children's strengths and weaknesses within the translational stage of writing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448599     DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jessica S Folsom; Luana Greulich; Cynthia Puranik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW).

Authors:  Young-Suk Grace Kim; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2017

3.  Towards an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and gender gap in written composition.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek; Brandy Gatlin
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-02-01

4.  Developmental and Individual Differences in Chinese Writing.

Authors:  Connie Qun Guan; Feifei Ye; Richard K Wagner; Wanjin Meng
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2013-07-01

5.  Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Young-Suk Kim; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Cynthia Puranik; Jessica Sidler Folsom; Luana Greulich; Richard K Wagner
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2011-10-01

6.  Emergent Writing in Preschoolers: Preliminary Evidence for a Theoretical Framework.

Authors:  Cynthia S Puranik; Christopher J Lonigan
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Theorization and an Empirical Investigation of the Component-Based and Developmental Text Writing Fluency Construct.

Authors:  Young-Suk Grace Kim; Brandy Gatlin; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2017-06-09

8.  Modeling the development of written language.

Authors:  Richard K Wagner; Cynthia S Puranik; Barbara Foorman; Elizabeth Foster; Laura Gehron Wilson; Erika Tschinkel; Patricia Thatcher Kantor
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2011-02-01

9.  Exploring the Amount and Type of Writing Instruction during Language Arts Instruction in Kindergarten Classrooms.

Authors:  Cynthia S Puranik; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jessica Folsom Sidler; Luana Greulich
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2014-02-01

10.  Writing Evaluation: Rater and Task Effects on the Reliability of Writing Scores for Children in Grades 3 and 4.

Authors:  Grace Young-Suk Kim; Christopher Schatschneider; Jeanne Wanzek; Brandy Gatlin; Stephanie Al Otaiba
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2017-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.