Literature DB >> 18448318

Supervised pattern recognition for the prediction of contrast-enhancement appearance in brain tumors from multivariate magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Michael C Lee1, Sarah J Nelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a pattern classification algorithm for use in predicting the location of new contrast-enhancement in brain tumor patients using data obtained via multivariate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging from a prior scan. We also explore the use of feature selection or weighting in improving the accuracy of the pattern classifier. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Contrast-enhanced MR images, perfusion images, diffusion images, and proton spectroscopic imaging data were obtained from 26 patients with glioblastoma multiforme brain tumors, divided into a design set and an unseen test set for verification of results. A k-NN algorithm was implemented to classify unknown data based on a set of training data with ground truth derived from post-treatment contrast-enhanced images; the quality of the k-NN results was evaluated using a leave-one-out cross-validation method. A genetic algorithm was implemented to select optimal features and feature weights for the k-NN algorithm. The binary representation of the weights was varied from 1 to 4 bits. Each individual parameter was thresholded as a simple classification technique, and the results compared with the k-NN.
RESULTS: The feature selection k-NN was able to achieve a sensitivity of 0.78+/-0.18 and specificity of 0.79+/-0.06 on the holdout test data using only 7 of the 38 original features. Similar results were obtained with non-binary weights, but using a larger number of features. Overfitting was also observed in the higher bit representations. The best single-variable classifier, based on a choline-to-NAA abnormality index computed from spectroscopic data, achieved a sensitivity of 0.79+/-0.20 and specificity of 0.71+/-0.11. The k-NN results had lower variation across patients than the single-variable classifiers.
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the optimized k-NN rule could be used for quantitative analysis of multivariate images, and be applied to a specific clinical research question. Selecting features was found to be useful in improving the accuracy of feature weighting algorithms and improving the comprehensibility of the results. We believe that in addition to lending insight into parameter relevance, such algorithms may be useful in aiding radiological interpretation of complex multimodality datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448318      PMCID: PMC3755619          DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  29 in total

1.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  E A Knopp; S Cha; G Johnson; A Mazumdar; J G Golfinos; D Zagzag; D C Miller; P J Kelly; I I Kricheff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours.

Authors:  K Krabbe; P Gideon; P Wagn; U Hansen; C Thomsen; F Madsen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Improved water and lipid suppression for 3D PRESS CSI using RF band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (BASING).

Authors:  J Star-Lack; S J Nelson; J Kurhanewicz; L R Huang; D B Vigneron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Automated classification of human brain tumours by neural network analysis using in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic metabolite phenotypes.

Authors:  J P Usenius; S Tuohimetsä; P Vainio; M Ala-Korpela; Y Hiltunen; R A Kauppinen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-07-08       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 5.  Using pattern analysis of in vivo proton MRSI data to improve the diagnosis and surgical management of patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  M C Preul; Z Caramanos; R Leblanc; J G Villemure; D L Arnold
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; D Wei; N Petrick; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Combination of feature-reduced MR spectroscopic and MR imaging data for improved brain tumor classification.

Authors:  Arjan W Simonetti; Willem J Melssen; Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi; Jack J A van Asten; Arend Heerschap; Lutgarde M C Buydens
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectra from brain tumours.

Authors:  A R Tate; J R Griffiths; I Martínez-Pérez; A Moreno; I Barba; M E Cabañas; D Watson; J Alonso; F Bartumeus; F Isamat; I Ferrer; F Vila; E Ferrer; A Capdevila; C Arús
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with glial tumors: a multicenter study.

Authors:  W G Negendank; R Sauter; T R Brown; J L Evelhoch; A Falini; E D Gotsis; A Heerschap; K Kamada; B C Lee; M M Mengeot; E Moser; K A Padavic-Shaller; J A Sanders; T A Spraggins; A E Stillman; B Terwey; T J Vogl; K Wicklow; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings.

Authors:  H J Aronen; I E Gazit; D N Louis; B R Buchbinder; F S Pardo; R M Weisskoff; G R Harsh; G R Cosgrove; E F Halpern; F H Hochberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Molecular classification of brain tumor biopsies using solid-state magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and robust classifiers.

Authors:  Ovidiu C Andronesi; Konstantinos D Blekas; Dionyssios Mintzopoulos; Loukas Astrakas; Peter M Black; A Aria Tzika
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of brain disorders.

Authors:  Ona Wu; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Alma Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04

3.  Proton MRS imaging in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Maria Zarifi; A Aria Tzika
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 4.  Imaging of brain tumors: MR spectroscopy and metabolic imaging.

Authors:  Alena Horská; Peter B Barker
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.