BACKGROUND: The time course of physicians' knowledge retention after learning activities has not been well characterized. Understanding the time course of retention is critical to optimizing the reinforcement of knowledge. DESIGN: Educational follow-up experiment with knowledge retention measured at 1 of 6 randomly assigned time intervals (0-55 days) after an online tutorial covering 2 American Diabetes Association guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: Internal and family medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS: Multiple-choice knowledge tests, subject characteristics including critical appraisal skills, and learner satisfaction. RESULTS:Of 197 residents invited, 91 (46%) completed the tutorial and were randomized; of these, 87 (96%) provided complete follow-up data. Ninety-two percent of the subjects rated the tutorial as "very good" or "excellent." Mean knowledge scores increased from 50% before the tutorial to 76% among those tested immediately afterward. Score gains were only half as great at 3-8 days and no significant retention was measurable at 55 days. The shape of the retention curve corresponded with a 1/4-power transformation of the delay interval. In multivariate analyses, critical appraisal skills and participant age were associated with greater initial learning, but no participant characteristic significantly modified the rate of decline in retention. CONCLUSIONS: Education that appears successful from immediate posttests and learner evaluations can result in knowledge that is mostly lost to recall over the ensuing days and weeks. To achieve longer-term retention, physicians should review or otherwise reinforce new learning after as little as 1 week.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The time course of physicians' knowledge retention after learning activities has not been well characterized. Understanding the time course of retention is critical to optimizing the reinforcement of knowledge. DESIGN: Educational follow-up experiment with knowledge retention measured at 1 of 6 randomly assigned time intervals (0-55 days) after an online tutorial covering 2 American Diabetes Association guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: Internal and family medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS: Multiple-choice knowledge tests, subject characteristics including critical appraisal skills, and learner satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 197 residents invited, 91 (46%) completed the tutorial and were randomized; of these, 87 (96%) provided complete follow-up data. Ninety-two percent of the subjects rated the tutorial as "very good" or "excellent." Mean knowledge scores increased from 50% before the tutorial to 76% among those tested immediately afterward. Score gains were only half as great at 3-8 days and no significant retention was measurable at 55 days. The shape of the retention curve corresponded with a 1/4-power transformation of the delay interval. In multivariate analyses, critical appraisal skills and participant age were associated with greater initial learning, but no participant characteristic significantly modified the rate of decline in retention. CONCLUSIONS: Education that appears successful from immediate posttests and learner evaluations can result in knowledge that is mostly lost to recall over the ensuing days and weeks. To achieve longer-term retention, physicians should review or otherwise reinforce new learning after as little as 1 week.
Authors: Michael S Wilkes; Frank C Day; Malathi Srinivasan; Erin Griffin; Daniel J Tancredi; Julie A Rainwater; Richard L Kravitz; Douglas S Bell; Jerome R Hoffman Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Roland Grad; Pierre Pluye; Eric Wong; Carlos Brailovsky; Jonathan L Moscovici; Janusz Kaczorowski; Charo Rodriguez; Francesca Luconi; Mathieu Rousseau; Mark Karanofsky; Bethany Delleman; Stefan Kegel; Mathew Mercuri; Maria Kluchnyk; Inge Schabort Journal: PRiMER Date: 2017-08-08
Authors: Carole Drexel; Anne Jacobson; Nicola A Hanania; Ben Whitfield; Jay Katz; Thomas Sullivan Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2011-05-23
Authors: Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Sune Bernd Emil Werner Räder; Anders Gaardsdal Holst; Lars Kayser; Charlotte Ringsted; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Lars Konge Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.463