Literature DB >> 18446035

Emergency surgery for complicated colorectal cancer. A two-decade trend analysis.

Riccardo Nascimbeni1, Hyginus Ngassa, Francesco Di Fabio, Eleonora Valloncini, Ernesto Di Betta, Bruno Salerni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Emergency procedures for colorectal cancer have worse outcomes than elective resections. Temporal trends in emergency surgery are analyzed by comparing two decade-related series of colorectal cancer patients.
METHODS: The clinical data of 985 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were collected during two decades (1975-1984 and 1995-2004). Rates of emergency surgery, operative mortality, 5-year cancer-related and overall survival were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: The rate of emergency surgery decreased from 81 out of 513 cases (16%) during 1975-1984 to 41 out of 471 cases (9%) during 1995-2004 (p = 0.005). Over the same time, the rate of curative resections in emergency increased from 46% (37/81 cases) to 76% (31/41 cases) (p < 0.001), while patient and tumor characteristics remained similar. Operative mortality after emergency procedures decreased from 14% (11 deaths) to 5% (2 deaths) and cancer-related survival increased from 21 to 42% (p = 0.03). However, when excluding palliative procedures, survival after emergency surgery increased from 52 to 58%, while after elective treatment it increased from 56 to 78% (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Frequency and operative mortality of emergency colorectal cancer surgery decreased substantially from 1975-1984 to 1995-2004. No significant improvement in long-term survival was observed when curative emergency resections only were considered. Further efforts are needed to reverse the diverging trend of long-term outcomes between emergency and elective curative procedures. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18446035     DOI: 10.1159/000128170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  5 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of colon cancer patients reported as emergencies.

Authors:  H Gunnarsson; K Jennische; S Forssell; J Granström; P Jestin; A Ekholm; L I Olsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of clinical outcomes with propensity-score matching for colorectal cancer presenting as an oncologic emergency.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ogawa; Yuji Miyamoto; Kazuto Harada; Kojiro Eto; Hiroshi Sawayama; Shiro Iwagami; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yoshifumi Baba; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2022-03-19

3.  Long-term trends in colorectal cancer: incidence, localization, and presentation.

Authors:  Øystein Høydahl; Tom-Harald Edna; Athanasios Xanthoulis; Stian Lydersen; Birger Henning Endreseth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allan M Golder; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan; Campbell S D Roxburgh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Factors associated with consultation behaviour for primary symptoms potentially indicating colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study on response to symptoms.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.