Literature DB >> 18445619

Two-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD-1 (Swiss) mice.

Rochelle W Tyl1, Christina B Myers, Melissa C Marr, Carol S Sloan, Nora P Castillo, M Michael Veselica, John C Seely, Stephen S Dimond, John P Van Miller, Ronald N Shiotsuka, Dieter Beyer, Steven G Hentges, John M Waechter.   

Abstract

Dietary bisphenol A (BPA) was evaluated in a mouse two-generation study at 0, 0.018, 0.18, 1.8, 30, 300, or 3500 ppm (0, 0.003, 0.03, 0.3, 5, 50, or 600 mg BPA/kg/day, 28 per sex per group). A concurrent positive control group of dietary 17beta-estradiol (0.5 ppm; 28 per sex) confirmed the sensitivity of CD-1 mice to an endogenous estrogen. There were no BPA-related effects on adult mating, fertility or gestational indices, ovarian primordial follicle counts, estrous cyclicity, precoital interval, offspring sex ratios or postnatal survival, sperm parameters or reproductive organ weights or histopathology (including the testes and prostate). Adult systemic effects: at 300 ppm, only centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy; at 3500 ppm, reduced body weight, increased kidney and liver weights, centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy, and renal nephropathy in males. At 3500 ppm, BPA also reduced F1/F2 weanling body weight, reduced weanling spleen and testes weights (with seminiferous tubule hypoplasia), slightly delayed preputial separation (PPS), and apparently increased the incidence of treatment-related, undescended testes only in weanlings, which did not result in adverse effects on adult reproductive structures or functions; this last finding is considered a developmental delay in the normal process of testes descent. It is likely that these transient effects were secondary to (and caused by) systemic toxicity. Gestational length was increased by 0.3 days in F1/F2 generations; the toxicological significance, if any, of this marginal difference is unknown. At lower doses (0.018-30 ppm), there were no treatment-related effects and no evidence of nonmonotonic dose-response curves for any parameter. The systemic no observable effect level (NOEL) was 30 ppm BPA (approximately 5 mg/kg/day); the reproductive/developmental NOEL was 300 ppm (approximately 50 mg/kg/day). Therefore, BPA is not considered a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445619     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  74 in total

1.  Rapid signaling actions of environmental estrogens in developing granule cell neurons are mediated by estrogen receptor ß.

Authors:  Hoa H Le; Scott M Belcher
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Mouse strain does not influence the overall effects of bisphenol a-induced toxicity in adult antral follicles.

Authors:  Jackye Peretz; Steven L Neese; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Assessment of recent developmental immunotoxicity studies with bisphenol A in the context of the 2015 EFSA t-TDI.

Authors:  Ellen V S Hessel; Janine Ezendam; Fleur A van Broekhuizen; Betty Hakkert; Jamie DeWitt; Berit Granum; Laurence Guzylack; B Paige Lawrence; Andre Penninks; Andrew A Rooney; Aldert H Piersma; Henk van Loveren
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Rebuttal of "Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research" by (Vom Saal 2010).

Authors:  Leon Earl Gray; Bryce Ryan; Andrew K Hotchkiss; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Maricel V Maffini; Carlos Sonnenschein; Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Developmental neurotoxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Donald G Stump; Melissa J Beck; Ann Radovsky; Robert H Garman; Lester L Freshwater; Larry P Sheets; M Sue Marty; John M Waechter; Stephen S Dimond; John P Van Miller; Ronald N Shiotsuka; Dieter Beyer; Anne H Chappelle; Steven G Hentges
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Good laboratory practices are not synonymous with good scientific practices, accurate reporting, or valid data.

Authors:  Frederick S vom Saal; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Basic exploratory research versus guideline-compliant studies used for hazard evaluation and risk assessment: bisphenol A as a case study.

Authors:  Rochelle W Tyl
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; Frederick S vom Saal; Benson T Akingbemi; Koji Arizono; Scott Belcher; Theo Colborn; Ibrahim Chahoud; D Andrew Crain; Francesca Farabollini; Louis J Guillette; Terry Hassold; Shuk-mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Taisen Iguchi; Susan Jobling; Jun Kanno; Hans Laufer; Michele Marcus; John A McLachlan; Angel Nadal; Jörg Oehlmann; Nicolás Olea; Paola Palanza; Stefano Parmigiani; Beverly S Rubin; Gilbert Schoenfelder; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Chris E Talsness; Julia A Taylor; Laura N Vandenberg; John G Vandenbergh; Sarah Vogel; Cheryl S Watson; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.