AIMS: To assess the service quality of care as perceived by people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was carried out among members of Diabetes Australia-Queensland with Type 2 diabetes. For 12 aspects of service quality derived from a literature review and focus group research, patients scored the relative importance of the aspects and their perception of quality of received care. A measure of service quality was derived by combining the relative importance and actual performance. RESULTS: A total of 603 people with Type 2 diabetes participated. Of the 12 aspects of care, communication, availability of support group, safety and prevention had the highest scores for importance; support group and basic amenities had the highest average performance values; but the highest service quality values were for support group, basic amenities, dignity and confidentiality. Younger participants had lower service quality scores (P = 0.001) and participants with good control of their diabetes had higher scores (P < 0.001). Compared with the reference population, our sample had 8.7% fewer people under 65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of people with Type 2 diabetes, there is a notable gap between their expectations and what they have actually received in most aspects of provided care. In addition, overall service quality and six aspects of service quality (choice of care provider, accessibility, prevention, continuity, timeliness and safety) were identified to be of inadequate quality. Hence, this study demonstrates a significant opportunity to improve quality of healthcare services.
AIMS: To assess the service quality of care as perceived by people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was carried out among members of Diabetes Australia-Queensland with Type 2 diabetes. For 12 aspects of service quality derived from a literature review and focus group research, patients scored the relative importance of the aspects and their perception of quality of received care. A measure of service quality was derived by combining the relative importance and actual performance. RESULTS: A total of 603 people with Type 2 diabetes participated. Of the 12 aspects of care, communication, availability of support group, safety and prevention had the highest scores for importance; support group and basic amenities had the highest average performance values; but the highest service quality values were for support group, basic amenities, dignity and confidentiality. Younger participants had lower service quality scores (P = 0.001) and participants with good control of their diabetes had higher scores (P < 0.001). Compared with the reference population, our sample had 8.7% fewer people under 65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of people with Type 2 diabetes, there is a notable gap between their expectations and what they have actually received in most aspects of provided care. In addition, overall service quality and six aspects of service quality (choice of care provider, accessibility, prevention, continuity, timeliness and safety) were identified to be of inadequate quality. Hence, this study demonstrates a significant opportunity to improve quality of healthcare services.