Literature DB >> 18445072

Reporting of informed consent, standard of care and post-trial obligations in global randomized intervention trials: a systematic survey of registered trials.

Emma R M Cohen1, Jennifer M O'Neill, Michel Joffres, Ross E G Upshur, Edward Mills.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ethical guidelines are designed to ensure benefits, protection and respect of participants in clinical research. Clinical trials must now be registered on open-access databases and provide details on ethical considerations. This systematic survey aimed to determine the extent to which recently registered clinical trials report the use of standard of care and post-trial obligations in trial registries, and whether trial characteristics vary according to setting.
METHODS: We selected global randomized trials registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.controlled-trials.com. We searched for intervention trials of HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis from 9 October 2004, the date of the most recent version of the Helsinki Declaration, to 10 April 2007.
RESULTS: We collected data from 312 trials. Fifty-eight percent (58%, 95% CI = 53 to 64) of trial protocols report informed consent. Fifty-eight percent (58%, 95% CI = 53 to 64) of trials report active controls. Almost no trials (1%, 95% CI = 0.5 to 3) mention post-trial provisions. Most trials measure surrogate outcomes. Twenty percent (20%, 95% CI = 16 to 25) of trials measure patient-important outcomes, such as death; and the odds that these outcomes are in a low income country are five times greater than for a developed country (odds ratio (OR) 5.03, 95% CI = 2.70 to 9.35, p = < 0.001). Pharmaceutical companies are involved in 28% (CI = 23 to 33) of trials and measure surrogate outcomes more often than nonpharmaceutical companies (OR 2.45, 95% CI = 1.18 to 5.09, p = 0.31).
CONCLUSION: We found a large discrepancy in the quality of reporting and approaches used in trials in developing settings compared to wealthier settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445072     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2008.00233.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  12 in total

Review 1.  Access to medications and conducting clinical trials in LMICs.

Authors:  Ikechi G Okpechi; Charles R Swanepoel; Francois Venter
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  The future of acquisition speed, coverage, sensitivity, and resolution.

Authors:  Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Human dignity as a basis for providing post-trial access to healthcare for research participants: a South African perspective.

Authors:  Pamela Andanda; Jane Wathuta
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Clinical trials in children.

Authors:  Pathma D Joseph; Jonathan C Craig; Patrina H Y Caldwell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The patient's safety and access to experimental drugs after the termination of clinical trials: regulations and trends.

Authors:  Ricardo Eccard da Silva; Angélica Amorim Amato; Thiago do Rego Sousa; Marta Rodrigues de Carvalho; Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi Novaes
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Review of multinational human subjects research: experience from the PHFI-Emory Center of Excellence partnership.

Authors:  Hemalatha Somsekhar; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nikhil Tandon; Rebecca Rousselle; Sarah Fisher; Aryeh D Stein
Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

7.  Randomized controlled trials of malaria intervention trials in Africa, 1948 to 2007: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Vittoria Lutje; Annette Gerritsen; Nandi Siegfried
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Clinical trials registered in clinical trial registry of India: A survey.

Authors:  Preeti Yadav; Mayur Chaudhari; Deepak Saxena; N D Kantharia
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2011-10

9.  Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Neema Sofaer; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 1.940

10.  Canadian research ethics board members' attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials.

Authors:  Kori Cook; Jeremy Snyder; John Calvert
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.