Literature DB >> 18444996

Habitat-dependent song divergence at subspecies level in the grey-breasted wood-wren.

C Dingle1, W Halfwerk, H Slabbekoorn.   

Abstract

Song divergence among populations can theoretically lead to reproductive divergence and speciation. Despite many studies, this theory is still controversial. Habitat differences have been shown to shape songs, but few studies have looked for a link between ecologically driven acoustic and genetic divergence. We tested whether environmental selection has driven song divergence in two genetically distinct, but hybridizing, subspecies of the grey-breasted wood-wren (Henicorhina leucophrys) in Ecuador. Several acoustic features showed significant divergence between the subspecies. Spectral song divergence correlated with ambient noise profiles which differed significantly between the habitats of both subspecies. Temporal song divergence also corresponded as expected to vegetation density. However, in terms of quantified levels of reverberations, we found no significant differences in habitat-dependent sound transmission properties. We conclude that ecological niche segregation may explain acoustic divergence among the two wren subspecies. The resulting habitat-dependent song divergence may have contributed to reproductive divergence by guiding assortative mating in parapatric conditions or just currently contribute to maintenance of reproductive isolation upon secondary contact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18444996     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01536.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  On the maintenance of bird song dialects.

Authors:  Robert Planqué; Nicholas F Britton; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds.

Authors:  Erwin A P Ripmeester; Jet S Kok; Jacco C van Rijssel; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Genetic drift does not sufficiently explain patterns of electric signal variation among populations of the mormyrid electric fish Paramormyrops kingsleyae.

Authors:  Sophie Picq; Joshua Sperling; Catherine J Cheng; Bruce A Carlson; Jason R Gallant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Geographic variation in the acoustic traits of greater horseshoe bats: testing the importance of drift and ecological selection in evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Keping Sun; Li Luo; Rebecca T Kimball; Xuewen Wei; Longru Jin; Tinglei Jiang; Guohong Li; Jiang Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Selection and geographic isolation influence hummingbird speciation: genetic, acoustic and morphological divergence in the wedge-tailed sabrewing (Campylopterus curvipennis).

Authors:  Clementina González; Juan Francisco Ornelas; Carla Gutiérrez-Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Degradation of rural and urban great tit song: testing transmission efficiency.

Authors:  Emily J Mockford; Rupert C Marshall; Torben Dabelsteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mountain chickadees from different elevations sing different songs: acoustic adaptation, temporal drift or signal of local adaptation?

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Acoustic divergence with gene flow in a lekking hummingbird with complex songs.

Authors:  Clementina González; Juan Francisco Ornelas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Variation in insulative feather structure in songbirds replacing each other along a tropical elevation gradient.

Authors:  Sahas Barve; Carlos Daniel Cadena
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.