Helen Killaspy1, Sonia Johnson, Michael King, Paul Bebbington. 1. UCL, Department of Mental Health Sciences, 67-73 Riding House Street, 2nd Floor, Charles Bell House, London WIW 7EJ, United Kingdom. h.killaspy@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Over the last thirty to forty years, psychiatric care in England has relocated from hospital-based settings to community mental health teams (CMHTs) and supported accommodation. Since the 1980s, two forms of intensive home based treatment have evolved in addition to CMHTS, assertive community treatment (ACT) and crisis resolution teams (CRTs). On the basis of evidence for their efficacy in the US and other countries, they have been implemented across England through the Government's National Service Framework for Mental Health. This paper describes this evidence and the first UK studies that were carried out to evaluate these newly implemented services. METHODS: Descriptions of the evaluations of ACT and CRTs in the inner London boroughs of Camden and Islington. RESULTS: The implementation of CRTs in North London were associated with reduced use of inpatient services, but the ACT teams were not. Both types of team were associated with greater patient satisfaction with services and the ACTs were better able to engage patients than CMHTs. CONCLUSIONS: The authors comment on the implications of the findings for service planners in terms of the difficulties in implementing innovative approaches based on the best available evidence when it originates outside the local context.
UNLABELLED: Over the last thirty to forty years, psychiatric care in England has relocated from hospital-based settings to community mental health teams (CMHTs) and supported accommodation. Since the 1980s, two forms of intensive home based treatment have evolved in addition to CMHTS, assertive community treatment (ACT) and crisis resolution teams (CRTs). On the basis of evidence for their efficacy in the US and other countries, they have been implemented across England through the Government's National Service Framework for Mental Health. This paper describes this evidence and the first UK studies that were carried out to evaluate these newly implemented services. METHODS: Descriptions of the evaluations of ACT and CRTs in the inner London boroughs of Camden and Islington. RESULTS: The implementation of CRTs in North London were associated with reduced use of inpatient services, but the ACT teams were not. Both types of team were associated with greater patient satisfaction with services and the ACTs were better able to engage patients than CMHTs. CONCLUSIONS: The authors comment on the implications of the findings for service planners in terms of the difficulties in implementing innovative approaches based on the best available evidence when it originates outside the local context.
Authors: Coralie Gandré; Jeanne Gervaix; Julien Thillard; Jean-Marc Macé; Jean-Luc Roelandt; Karine Chevreul Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.390