Literature DB >> 18444327

Science 2.0.

M Mitchell Waldrop.   

Abstract

Science 2.0 generally refers to new practices of scientists who post raw experimental results, nascent theories, claims of discovery and draft papers on the Web for others to see and comment on. Proponents say these "open access" practices make scientific progress more collaborative and therefore more productive. Critics say scientists who put preliminary findings online risk having others copy or exploit the work to gain credit or even patents. Despite pros and cons, Science 2.0 sites are beginning to proliferate; one notable example is the OpenWetWare project started by biological engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18444327     DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0508-68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Am        ISSN: 0036-8733            Impact factor:   2.142


  10 in total

1.  What do computer scientists tweet? Analyzing the link-sharing practice on Twitter.

Authors:  Marco Schmitt; Robert Jäschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Action and language mechanisms in the brain: data, models and neuroinformatics.

Authors:  Michael A Arbib; James J Bonaiuto; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; David Kemmerer; Brian MacWhinney; Finn Årup Nielsen; Erhan Oztop
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-01

3.  Grid-enabled measures: using Science 2.0 to standardize measures and share data.

Authors:  Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse; Abdul R Shaikh; Paul Courtney; Glen Morgan; Erik Augustson; Sarah Kobrin; Kerry Y Levin; Cynthia Helba; David Garner; Marsha Dunn; Kisha Coa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Cyberinfrastructure and the biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Open semantic annotation of scientific publications using DOMEO.

Authors:  Paolo Ciccarese; Marco Ocana; Tim Clark
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2012-04-24

6.  BioIMAX: a Web 2.0 approach for easy exploratory and collaborative access to multivariate bioimage data.

Authors:  Christian Loyek; Nasir M Rajpoot; Michael Khan; Tim W Nattkemper
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Patrick Michel Archambault; Tom H van de Belt; Francisco J Grajales Iii; Gunther Eysenbach; Karine Aubin; Irving Gold; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Craig E Kuziemsky; Alexis F Turgeon; Julien Poitras; Marjan J Faber; Jan A M Kremer; Marcel Heldoorn; Andrea Bilodeau; France Légaré
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-04-11

8.  Disentangling public participation in science and biomedicine.

Authors:  Christopher Kelty; Aaron Panofsky
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 9.  Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Patrick M Archambault; Tom H van de Belt; Francisco J Grajales; Marjan J Faber; Craig E Kuziemsky; Susie Gagnon; Andrea Bilodeau; Simon Rioux; Willianne L D M Nelen; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Alexis F Turgeon; Karine Aubin; Irving Gold; Julien Poitras; Gunther Eysenbach; Jan A M Kremer; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Activities of Daily Living Ontology for Ubiquitous Systems: Development and Evaluation.

Authors:  Przemysław R Woznowski; Emma L Tonkin; Peter A Flach
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.