Literature DB >> 18443873

Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures.

Andreas Shamiyeh1, Karl Glaser, Heinz Kratochwill, Karl Hörmandinger, Franz Fellner, Wolfgang U Wayand, Jörg Zehetner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopy, 50% of all complications occur during establishment of the pneumoperitoneum. Elevation of the fascia is recommended for the Veress needle approach, although the benefit has not been proved to date. This study aimed to evaluate the intraabdominal changes during lifting of the fascia with regard to the distance from the fascia to the retroperitoneal vessels and the intestine for access in laparoscopy.
METHODS: For 10 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the operation started with the computed tomography (CT) scan. After orotracheal intubation, a CT scan of the umbilical region was performed. After a supraumbilical incision, the fascia was freed and elevated with stay sutures. During maximal elevation, a second CT scan was performed. Distances to the intestinal (small bowel) and retroperitoneal structures (iliac artery, vena cava) were measured. Intraabdominal pressure was measured with a transcystic balloon manometer before (a) and after (b) elevation of the fascia, after insertion of the Veress needle (c), and after completion of the insufflations (d).
RESULTS: Lifting of the fascia increased the distance between the fascia and the intestinal structures in the patients with no prior abdominal surgery (mean distance, 1.92 cm; range, 0.87-2.67 cm) and the distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal vessels (mean distance, 7.83 cm; range, 3-11 cm). The median intraabdominal pressures in terms of cm H(2)O were 5.4 for a, 1.1 for b, 1.1 for c, and 12. 5 for d.
CONCLUSION: Elevation of the fascia before the first entrance to the abdominal cavity for laparoscopy may increase safety due to a significant enlargement of distance between the fascia and the retroperitoneal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443873     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9920-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases.

Authors:  M Catarci; M Carlini; P Gentileschi; E Santoro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Neudecker; S Sauerland; E Neugebauer; R Bergamaschi; H J Bonjer; A Cuschieri; K-H Fuchs; Ch Jacobi; F W Jansen; A-M Koivusalo; A Lacy; M J McMahon; B Millat; W Schwenk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Access-related complications in laparoscopic surgery. Tips and tricks to avoid trocar complications].

Authors:  C G Schmedt; B J Leibl; R Bittner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Needle and trocar injuries in diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia: what is the true incidence of these complications?

Authors:  Rocco Orlando; Pietro Palatini; Flavio Lirussi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 5.  Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T L Merlin; J E Hiller; G J Maddern; G G Jamieson; A R Brown; A Kolbe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion.

Authors:  J Mayol; J Garcia-Aguilar; E Ortiz-Oshiro; J A De-Diego Carmona; J A Fernandez-Represa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy.

Authors:  H M Hasson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Cutting versus conical tip designs.

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1995-02

9.  Techniques of pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  R V Ballem; J Rudomanski
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-02

10.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H H Sigman; G M Fried; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; M J Wexler; J L Meakins; J S Barkun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-08
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Robot-assisted transvaginal peritoneoscopy using confocal endomicroscopy: a feasibility study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Richard C Newton; David P Noonan; Valentina Vitiello; James Clark; Christopher J Payne; Jianzhong Shang; Mikael Sodergren; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A simple and safe method for creating closed pneumoperitoneum in slim patients with firm abdominal skin.

Authors:  P A Jategaonkar; S P Jategaonkar; S P Yadav
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.